0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Adsorption of heavy metals by microplastics in aquatic environments: mechanism, multi-factor regulation and ecological risks

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2026 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Zeyu Li, Lei Chen, Lei Chen, Wei Gao, Wei Gao, Ye Li, Ke Li, Ke Li, Ying Liu, Yu Gao, Yu Gao

Summary

This review examined how microplastics adsorb heavy metals like lead, cadmium, and copper in water, creating compound pollution. Researchers found that polar plastics can absorb two to three times more metals than non-polar ones, and that aging from UV exposure increases metal absorption by 40 to 60 percent. The combined toxicity of microplastics with heavy metals can cause double the oxidative stress in aquatic organisms compared to either pollutant alone, highlighting risks that current safety standards may not adequately address.

Microplastics (MPs) can adsorb heavy metals well in water. When these toxic substances interact, the ecological risks will be greatly aggravated, constituting compound pollution. In this review, we summarized how microplastics adsorb heavy metals - such as Pb, Cd and Cu - and found the following three points: (1) Polar polymers, such as polyamide (PA), can adsorb Cu 2 to 3 times more than non-polar polymers (such as polyethylene (PE)). This is because their surface and amide groups combine with each other to form a complex. This highlights the necessity of distinguishing polymer types in risk assessment protocols. (2) Plastics such as polystyrene (PS) will absorb 40 % to 60 % more Cd during aging (such as ultraviolet irradiation). This is mainly because new oxygen-rich groups (such as carboxyl or hydroxyl groups) begin to form on their surfaces. This indicates that current regulations based on virgin plastics may significantly underestimate the transport capacity of MPs in real environments. (3) When microplastics and heavy metals are mixed, their combined toxicity makes aquatic organisms experience oxidative stress twice to twice as much as when exposed to a single pollutant alone. This quantifies the synergistic amplification effect that must be accounted for in ecological safety standards. We also built a framework called "Polymer Type-Environmental Factors-Adsorption Model" and found some gaps we know, such as the differences in adsorption in the mixed state of multiple pollutants and the impact of aging on adsorption. Overall, this review connects mechanistic insights to ecological risks, providing a theoretical basis to formulate more precise plans to control pollution.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Adsorption of heavy metals by biofilm-coated microplastics in aquatic environments: Mechanisms, isotherm and kinetic processes, and influencing factors

This review synthesizes research on how biofilms—microbial coatings that naturally form on microplastics in water—alter the particles' ability to absorb heavy metals like lead, copper, and cadmium, finding that biofilmed microplastics generally adsorb more metal than bare plastic and that electrostatic forces and surface complexation are the dominant mechanisms. This matters because microplastics coated in both biofilm and toxic metals may deliver a double dose of contamination to organisms that ingest them. The review identifies key gaps, including how competitive metal mixtures and shifting biofilm composition over time affect this combined pollution risk.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics as a vehicle of heavy metals in aquatic environments: A review of adsorption factors, mechanisms, and biological effects

This review summarizes how microplastics in water can absorb and carry toxic heavy metals like lead and cadmium, making them more dangerous to aquatic life than either pollutant alone. Environmental factors such as water acidity, salinity, and organic matter influence how much metal sticks to microplastic surfaces. Since contaminated seafood is a major source of human exposure, understanding these interactions is important for assessing health risks.

Article Tier 2

Adsorption behavior of UV aged microplastics on the heavy metals Pb(II) and Cu(II) in aqueous solutions

Researchers examined how UV aging affects the adsorption of lead and copper onto polypropylene, polyethylene, and polystyrene microplastics, finding that aging creates new oxidation functional groups that enhance heavy metal adsorption capacity.

Article Tier 2

Adsorption properties and mechanism of Cu(II) on virgin and aged microplastics in the aquatic environment

Researchers examined how UV aging changes the surface properties of polyamide and polylactic acid microplastics and affects their ability to adsorb copper ions in water. The study found that UV irradiation altered the physical and chemical characteristics of both plastic types, increasing their capacity to bind heavy metals. Evidence indicates that weathered microplastics may act as more effective carriers of heavy metal contaminants in aquatic environments compared to virgin plastics.

Article Tier 2

Adsorption Characteristics of Heavy Metals onto Functionalized Microplastics

This study tested how three types of functionalized microplastics—polyacrylate, biobased polyurethane, and petroleum-based polyurethane—absorb toxic heavy metals including lead, copper, and cadmium. Smaller particles and UV-weathered plastic showed higher adsorption, meaning aged microplastics in the environment can act as concentrated carriers of heavy metal contamination, amplifying ecological risk.

Share this paper