We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Behavior and flow of microplastics during sludge treatment in Japan
AI summary Read the abstract
Sampling of two Osaka wastewater treatment plants found microplastics at every stage of the sludge treatment process, with 13 polymer types identified; concentration increased through dewatering, but the total MP load in final biosolids was lower than in raw sludge.
Microplastic (MP) pollution is a growing public and scientific concern. In urban environments, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are major sources of MPs. This study sampled sludge and separated water from each sludge treatment unit in two WWTPs in Osaka, Japan. Analyzing method for MPs in sewage sludge was optimized, ultrasonic pretreatment and double digestion were introduced into the analyzing method of MPs in sewage sludge, recovering test of standard MPs proved its high efficiency. Then MPs larger than 100 μm were extracted and analyzed, their size and type were recorded, the MP concentration was calculated, and the MP flow in the sludge treatment system was estimated. MPs were detected at every step of the sludge treatment process, and 13 types of MPs were identified. The MP concentration in sludge ranged from 81 ± 48 to 6470 ± 1490 particles/kg dry sludge (DS). In the separated water, MP concentrations were much lower, ranging from 0 to 1740 ± 794 particles/kg DS. During the thickening and dewatering processes, nearly all MPs were transferred into thickened or dewatered sludge; only 5-10 % of MPs returned to the primary sedimentation pond with the separated water. The most common types of MPs were PMMA, PE, and PS. No significant differences in MP type distributions were observed among sampling batches; however, significant differences in a few types of MPs were detected between treatment units, which requires further investigation. All detected MPs were smaller than 1000 μm; larger MPs might have been removed in the grit chamber before reaching the primary or secondary sedimentation ponds. Overall, the particle size distribution did not substantially change during sludge treatment.
More Papers Like This
Fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and their environmental dispersion with effluent and sludge
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tracked microplastics through a wastewater treatment plant and found 12 different polymer types in effluents and sludge, with smaller particles (25–104 μm) most abundant and fibres displaying lower sizes than fragments. The study demonstrates that WWTPs do not fully remove microplastics and that processed sludge marketed as soil amendment carries plastic contamination.
Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tracked microplastic particles through multiple stages of a wastewater treatment plant, finding that particles were concentrated in sludge but that a fraction passed through each treatment stage and remained in the final effluent.
Variation in microplastic concentration, characteristics and distribution in sewage sludge & biosolids around the world
AI summary Read the abstract
This review synthesizes global data on microplastic concentrations, characteristics, and distribution in sewage sludge and biosolids, drawing on studies showing wastewater treatment works remove 57-99% of incoming microplastics, concentrating them in sludge byproducts. The review highlights the significance of this concentration pathway and what happens to these microplastics when sludge is applied to land or otherwise managed.
Treatment characteristics of microplastics at biological sewage treatment facilities in Korea
AI summary Read the abstract
A study of two biological sewage treatment facilities in South Korea found that microplastics were present in influent at high concentrations but that treatment removed 80-95% of particles, with sludge as the main repository for retained microplastics. The results confirm that while treatment significantly reduces microplastic discharge, effluent still releases large numbers of particles into receiving waters.
An audit of microplastic abundance throughout three Australian wastewater treatment plants
AI summary Read the abstract
Microplastic abundance was audited throughout three Australian wastewater treatment plants, tracking particles from influent through all treatment stages and into both effluent and biosolids. While treatment removed most microplastics from effluent, the majority were captured in biosolids — which are often land-applied — highlighting biosolids as the primary pathway for microplastics leaving wastewater treatment systems.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.