We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Combined toxicity of microplastics and arsenic to earthworm (Eisenia fetida): a comparison of polyethylene, polylactic acid, and polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate
Summary
Researchers compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics (PLA and PBAT) interact with arsenic in soil using earthworms as a model organism over 28 days. The study found that all microplastic types reduced arsenic bioaccumulation in earthworm tissues, with biodegradable plastics showing stronger reductions, though co-exposure still caused physiological and oxidative stress effects.
Microplastics (MPs) derived from degraded agricultural mulching films frequently co-occur with arsenic in cropland soils, yet their joint toxic effects on soil fauna remain insufficiently understood. This study compared conventional non-biodegradable microplastics (polyethylene, PE) with biodegradable microplastics (polylactic acid, PLA; and polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate, PBAT) co-exposed with arsenate (As(V)) in a 28-day soil exposure experiment using earthworm Eisenia fetida as model organism. Results showed that microplastic abundance in the earthworm gut increased over time, whereas co-exposure consistently reduced arsenic bioaccumulation in tissues, with stronger reductions observed for PLA and PBAT than for PE. Across multiple physiological and oxidative stress-related biomarkers, As(V) induced growth inhibition and oxidative injury, while the presence of microplastics generally mitigated these adverse responses. Integrated Biomarker Response (IBR) analysis indicated lower overall stress in the combined treatments than in the corresponding single As(V) treatments, and interaction assessment based on the IBR-Effect Addition Index (EAI) model further suggested antagonistic effects between As(V) and all three microplastics. Overall, biodegradable microplastics (PLA MPs and PBAT MPs) exhibited a greater capacity to attenuate arsenic toxicity than conventional PE MPs. These findings demonstrate polymer-dependent interactions in arsenic-microplastic co-contamination and provide a scientific basis for ecological risk assessment of conventional and biodegradable mulching films in agricultural soils.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Exposure to microplastics lowers arsenic accumulation and alters gut bacterial communities of earthworm Metaphire californica
Researchers examined how microplastics interact with arsenic contamination in earthworms and their gut bacteria. They found that microplastics actually reduced arsenic accumulation in earthworm tissues by adsorbing the arsenic and lowering its bioavailability. The study suggests that while microplastics altered gut bacterial communities, their presence may lessen arsenic toxicity in soil organisms by changing how the metal moves through the food chain.
Unveiling the impact of polystyrene and low-density polyethylene microplastics on arsenic toxicity in earthworms
Researchers examined how polystyrene and polyethylene microplastics interact with arsenic contamination to affect earthworms in soil. While the microplastics did not change arsenic's effects on survival, growth, or reproduction, they did increase oxidative stress and reduce the activity of protective antioxidant enzymes when combined with arsenic exposure. The study provides evidence that microplastics in contaminated soils may subtly alter how organisms handle heavy metal stress, even when survival rates appear unaffected.
Effects of conventional versus biodegradable microplastic exposure on oxidative stress and gut microorganisms in earthworms: A comparison with two different soils
Researchers compared the toxic effects of conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics on earthworms in two different soil types. Both types of microplastic caused oxidative stress and altered gut microbiota in earthworms, with toxicity increasing at higher concentrations. The study found that microplastic concentration was more important than the type of plastic or soil in determining the level of harm, and that biodegradable plastics were not necessarily safer for soil organisms.
Impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei
Researchers compared the ecotoxicological effects of conventional low-density polyethylene microplastics (PE-MPs) and biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate microplastics (PBAT-BD-MPs) on earthworms (Eisenia andrei) across a range of concentrations in an eight-week reproduction test. Both polymer types were assessed for impacts on survival, reproduction, growth, and oxidative stress in soil organisms.
Exploring the toxicity of biodegradable microplastics and imidacloprid to earthworms (Eisenia fetida) from morphological and gut microbial perspectives
Researchers found that biodegradable microplastics made from polylactic acid (PLA) combined with the pesticide imidacloprid caused more severe harm to earthworms than either pollutant alone, including higher death rates, tissue damage, and disrupted gut bacteria. This is concerning because PLA plastics are marketed as eco-friendly alternatives, yet they can still break down into harmful microplastics in soil. The study shows that biodegradable plastics may actually make pesticide contamination worse for soil organisms.