We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Aging of microplastics in a subtropical river system in Florida, USA
Summary
Researchers conducted a two-year field study in a subtropical Florida river to track how five common polymer types age across different environmental layers from air to sediment. They found that aging processes, including surface cracking, chemical oxidation, and microbial colonization, varied significantly by polymer type and environmental position, revealing the complex ways microplastics transform in river systems.
Rivers are dynamic conduits for microplastics, yet the interplay between polymer chemistry, environmental exposure, and microbial colonization remains poorly understood. We conducted a 24 month in situ study in the Hillsborough River, Florida (USA) assessing the aging of five polymer types— low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene, polystyrene (PS), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET)—across five environmental layers: air, surface water, middle water, deep water, and sediment. Particles were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy, flow cytometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and image-based shape metrics. Aging patterns were strongly layer- and polymer type-dependent: PET and PS exhibited the highest chemical weathering (carbonyl indices up to 12.7 and 4.9, respectively) and microbial colonization (average cell counts of 1.5 × 10 ^5 ± 1.2 × 10 ^5 and 1.3 × 10 ^5 ± 1.0 × 10 ^5 , respectively), while LDPE and HDPE supported substantial biofilm formation (average biomass of 4.6 ± 4.1 mg and 6.5 ± 7.6 mg, respectively) with limited photooxidation (average carbonyl indices of 0.7 ± 0.6 and 0.7 ± 0.7, respectively). Air-exposed particles underwent continuous photooxidation, surface and middle water layers promoted dense microbial biofilms (average biomass of 5.6 ± 5.2 mg and 4.1 ± 3.8 mg, respectively), and deep water and sediment showed slower colonization and lower chemical alteration (average carbonyl indices of 2.1 ± 3.0 and 2.1 ± 3.6, respectively). Mass and particle shape remained largely stable, highlighting microplastic persistence under natural riverine conditions. Computer simulations corroborated colonization trends, though sediment dynamics were underestimated, emphasizing the need for refined modeling. These results demonstrate that polymer type and environmental context govern early aging processes and suggest that targeted management strategies should account for both microplastic polymer type and riverine layer-specific transport.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Aging of Microplastics across a Constructed Wetland
Researchers studied the weathering and microbial colonization of five microplastic polymer types over 18 months within four habitat zones of a constructed wastewater wetland, finding that microorganisms colonized plastics rapidly and that weathering rates varied by polymer type and habitat.
Aging of Microplasticsacross a Constructed Wetland
Researchers tracked the aging of five microplastic polymer types — LDPE, HDPE, polypropylene, polystyrene, and PET — across four habitats within a wastewater constructed wetland over 18 months, finding that physical, chemical, and biological processes jointly drive weathering and microorganism colonisation of plastics in these treatment systems.
Weathering Processand Characteristics of Microplasticsin Coastal Wetlands: A 24-Month In Situ Study
Researchers conducted a 24-month study of microplastic weathering in coastal wetlands, characterizing how wetland-specific conditions including UV exposure, salinity, and biological activity alter plastic surface chemistry, fragmentation, and biofilm colonization over time.
Quantitative study of microplastic degradation in urban hydrosystems: Comparing in situ environmentally aged microplastics vs. artificially aged materials generated via accelerated photo-oxidation
Researchers compared how polyethylene microplastics degrade in real urban water environments versus under controlled laboratory UV exposure. They found that lab-aged plastics showed primarily physical and chemical changes from UV light, while microplastics collected from stormwater and sediments also showed signs of biological degradation and hydrolysis. The study demonstrates that artificial aging alone does not fully replicate the complex degradation processes microplastics undergo in actual urban water systems.
Which factors mainly drive the photoaging of microplastics in freshwater?
This study systematically investigated the roles of UV irradiation, oxygen, temperature, and physical abrasion in the photoaging of polystyrene microplastics in freshwater. UV irradiation and mechanical abrasion were identified as the dominant aging factors, and their combined effect caused more extensive surface oxidation and fragmentation than either alone.