We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Effects of Exposure to Different Types of Microplastics on the Growth and Development of Rana zhenhaiensis Tadpoles
Summary
Researchers exposed frog tadpoles to three types of microplastics -- polypropylene, polystyrene, and polyethylene -- and found that polyethylene and polystyrene caused the most harm, significantly reducing metamorphosis rates, body weight, and body length. These two plastics also caused visible liver tissue damage and altered gut bacterial communities compared to controls. The study reveals that different types of microplastics can have very different levels of toxicity to developing amphibians.
Microplastic (MP) pollution is a major environmental problem, but a comparative study of the toxicological effects of different MPs remains lacking. To explore the toxicological effects of three different microplastics, namely, polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene (PE), Zhenhai brown frog (Rana zhenhaiensis) tadpoles were used as the model animal. The results showed that exposure to PE and PS significantly reduced the metamorphosis rate of the tadpoles. Compared with the control group, the body weight of tadpoles in all MP treatments was significantly reduced compared with that of the control group. In addition, exposure to PE reduced the body length and hind limb length of tadpoles. The number of pigment cells increased and intercellular spaces expanded in the liver tissues of tadpoles receiving PS and PE treatments. The composition and function of the intestinal microbiota in the PP treatment and control groups were similar, whereas between the PS treatment and control, they differed. Liver transcriptome sequencing revealed significant alterations in key genes associated with oxidative stress, energy metabolism, immune response, and apoptosis signaling pathways with PS treatment and PP treatment. In summary, MPs may have harmed tadpoles to varying degrees by interfering with related signaling pathways. The negative effects of PE and PS were greater than those of PP.