0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Presence of High-Density Polyethylene Nanoplastics (HDPE-NPs) in Soil Can Influence the Growth Parameters of Tomato Plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at Various Stages of Development

Sustainability 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 43 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jian-Ming Hao, Shiv O. Prasher, Ali Mawof, Irene Tovar, Saji George

Summary

Researchers grew tomato plants in soil spiked with high-density polyethylene nanoplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations, finding that the nanoplastics slowed germination, reduced root and shoot growth, and affected plant physiology at multiple developmental stages. Effects were dose-dependent and more pronounced at higher nanoplastic concentrations. As nanoplastics are now detected in agricultural soils through biosolid application and irrigation, this study raises concerns about the impact of nano-sized plastic contamination on food crop yields.

Polymers

Contamination of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems with microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) has raised significant global concerns. While most studies have focused on aquatic contamination, knowledge concerning the effect of MPs and NPs in biosolids on agricultural field crops remains limited, as is the range of polymer types tested. In this study, polyethylene nanoplastics (HDPE-NPs, <500 nm diameter) were produced in the lab, and their effect on tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) was studied at different growth stages. Physical and chemical characterizations of the HDPE-NPs were performed. Compared to the control group, the presence of 2.8 mg/kg HDPE-NPs in soil increased tomato leaf greenness (p < 0.05), while the presence of 0.5 mg/kg HDPE-NPs in the soil lowered water use efficiency (WUE, p < 0.05) of the plants in the early vegetative stage. Soil CO2 emissions were significantly lower under both the 0.5 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 2.8 mg/kg HDPE-NPs treatments (p < 0.05). At the early germination stage, HDPE-NPs in the soil resulted in stunted seedlings (p < 0.001). Moreover, the average fruit weight and number of fruits borne by mature plants were adversely affected, possibly because of potential alterations in soil nitrogen content and associated plant uptake pathways. A pattern of hormetic dose response was observed for some measured parameters, including leaf greenness, plant WUE, and soil CO2 emissions, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Overall, the range between 1 and 5 mg/kg concentration of HDPE-NPs in soil was found to have the greatest impact on tomato plants, while other factors may contribute to the observed effects.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Polyethylene nanoplastics affected morphological, physiological, and molecular indices in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Polyethylene nanoplastics in soil caused significant damage to tomato plants, including reduced growth, delayed flowering, lower fruit quality, and changes in DNA methylation patterns. Even at low concentrations, the nanoplastics triggered oxidative stress and altered gene expression in the plants. These findings raise concerns about food safety because nanoplastic contamination in farm soil could reduce both the yield and nutritional quality of tomatoes and potentially other food crops.

Article Tier 2

Effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on tomato plant growth, fruit yield and quality

Researchers investigated how polystyrene nanoplastics affect tomato plant growth and fruit quality, finding that exposure reduced seedling biomass, impaired photosynthesis, and triggered oxidative stress. At higher concentrations, the nanoplastics inhibited mineral uptake and diminished fruit yield along with nutritional quality markers like vitamin C and lycopene. The study highlights that nanoplastic contamination in agricultural soils could pose a meaningful threat to food crop productivity and nutritional value.

Article Tier 2

Phytotoxicity of polystyrene, polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)

Researchers tested the effects of polystyrene, polyethylene, and polypropylene microplastics on tomato plant growth using hydroponic experiments at various concentrations. The study found that all three types of microplastics negatively affected seed germination, root growth, and plant development, with effects varying by plastic type and concentration. These findings suggest that microplastic contamination in agricultural settings could interfere with crop growth and food production.

Clinical Trial Tier 1

Effects of microplastics polluted soil on the growth of Solanum lycopersicum L.

This study tested how microplastic-contaminated soil affects tomato plant growth, finding that higher concentrations of plastic particles in soil reduced plant height, root development, and overall crop health. The results suggest that microplastic pollution in farmland could reduce food crop yields and potentially affect the quality of the produce we eat.

Article Tier 2

MICROPLÁSTICOS Y NANOPLÁSTICOS: UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE SU IMPACTO EN EL CRECIMIENTO DE TOMATE (Solanum lycopersicum)

This systematic review analysed published studies on the effects of synthetic microplastics and nanoplastics on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) growth, examining how polymer type, particle size, concentration, and growth medium modulate phytotoxicity. The review found that MP and NP exposure consistently impaired biomass accumulation, plant height, flower and fruit production, and root and shoot length, with higher concentrations and smaller particle sizes generally producing the most pronounced negative effects.

Share this paper