0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Polyethylene nanoplastics affected morphological, physiological, and molecular indices in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2025 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 63 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Mohammad Nazari, Alireza Iranbakhsh, Mostafa Ebadi, Zahra Oraghi Ardebili

Summary

Polyethylene nanoplastics in soil caused significant damage to tomato plants, including reduced growth, delayed flowering, lower fruit quality, and changes in DNA methylation patterns. Even at low concentrations, the nanoplastics triggered oxidative stress and altered gene expression in the plants. These findings raise concerns about food safety because nanoplastic contamination in farm soil could reduce both the yield and nutritional quality of tomatoes and potentially other food crops.

Polymers

This study explored morphological, physiological, molecular, and epigenetic responses of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) to soil contamination with polyethylene nanoplastics (PENP; 0.01, 0.1, and 1 gkg soil). The PENP pollution led to severe changes in plant morphogenesis. The PENP treatments were associated with decreased plant biomass, reduced internode length, delayed flowering, and prolonged fruit ripening. Abnormal inflorescences, flowers, and fruits observed in the PENP-exposed seedlings support genetic changes and meristem dysfunction. Exposure of seedlings to PENP increased HO accumulation and damaged membranes, implying oxidative stress. The PENP treatments induced activities of catalase (EC1.11.1.6), peroxidase (EC1.11.1.7), and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (EC4.3.1.24) enzymes. Soil contamination with PENP also decreased the net photosynthesis, maximum photosystem efficiency, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate. The nano-pollutant upregulated the expression of the histone deacetylase (HDA3) gene and R2R3MYB transcription factor. However, the AP2a gene was down-regulated in response to the PENP treatment. Besides, EPNP epigenetically contributed to changes in DNA methylation. The concentrations of proline, soluble phenols, and flavonoids also displayed an upward trend in response to the applied PENP treatments. The long-term exposure of seedlings to PENP influenced fruit biomass, firmness, ascorbate, lycopene, and flavonoid content. These findings raise concerns about the hazardous aspects of PENP to agricultural ecosystems and food security.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Presence of High-Density Polyethylene Nanoplastics (HDPE-NPs) in Soil Can Influence the Growth Parameters of Tomato Plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at Various Stages of Development

Researchers grew tomato plants in soil spiked with high-density polyethylene nanoplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations, finding that the nanoplastics slowed germination, reduced root and shoot growth, and affected plant physiology at multiple developmental stages. Effects were dose-dependent and more pronounced at higher nanoplastic concentrations. As nanoplastics are now detected in agricultural soils through biosolid application and irrigation, this study raises concerns about the impact of nano-sized plastic contamination on food crop yields.

Article Tier 2

Effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on tomato plant growth, fruit yield and quality

Researchers investigated how polystyrene nanoplastics affect tomato plant growth and fruit quality, finding that exposure reduced seedling biomass, impaired photosynthesis, and triggered oxidative stress. At higher concentrations, the nanoplastics inhibited mineral uptake and diminished fruit yield along with nutritional quality markers like vitamin C and lycopene. The study highlights that nanoplastic contamination in agricultural soils could pose a meaningful threat to food crop productivity and nutritional value.

Article Tier 2

Integrated physiological, metabolomic, and transcriptomic responses of maize (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) to nanoplastic-induced stress

Researchers exposed maize and soybean crops to polyethylene and polypropylene nanoplastics in soil and found that high concentrations suppressed plant growth and caused oxidative stress in both species. The nanoplastics accumulated in plant roots and disrupted normal gene activity and metabolism, with soybeans being more sensitive than maize. These findings raise concerns about food crop quality and safety as nanoplastic contamination of agricultural soil increases.

Article Tier 2

Impact of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) microplastic on growth, photosynthesis and nutrient uptake of Solanum lycopersicum L. (Tomato)

Adding PVC microplastics to soil reduced tomato plant growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake in a dose-dependent manner, even though no visible damage appeared on the leaves. At the molecular level, the microplastics disrupted genes and proteins involved in photosynthesis and nutrient absorption. This matters for food safety because microplastics in agricultural soils could reduce crop yields and potentially enter the food supply.

Article Tier 2

Impacts of Microplastics and Nanoplastics on Tomato Crops: A Critical Review

This review covers the impacts of microplastics and nanoplastics on tomato crops, documenting disruption at germination, root development, flowering, and fruit production stages. It also examines how these particles alter soil microbial communities and identifies priority research areas for understanding MP effects on major food crops.

Share this paper