We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Surface Water Monitoring with Sedimentation Boxes: Assessing the Sampling Performance and Its Effect on Microplastic Concentration
AI summary Read the abstract
This study tested whether passive "sedimentation box" samplers — devices that slow water flow to settle out suspended particles — can effectively capture microplastics from surface waters over time, rather than relying on infrequent spot sampling with nets or pumps. Results showed the boxes reliably retained a range of particle sizes and types, and their performance aligned with the physical behavior of other suspended particles in water. Passive samplers like these could help create more consistent, time-integrated microplastic monitoring that better captures the true variability of plastic pollution in rivers and lakes.
Currently, there are still no harmonized and thus reproducible methods for microplastics (MP) sampling. Infrequent spot sampling with, e.g., nets, pumps, or containers, does not reflect the large spatial and temporal variety of MP abundance, and there is little experience with time-integrated, passive sampling methods. However, passive samplers have been applied thoroughly to recover suspended particulate matter (SPM) from water bodies. The physical and chemical characteristics of MP are in range with those of other materials belonging to SPM, and we state that MP are an integral component of SPM. In general, passive samplers like the sedimentation box decrease the flow velocity, enhancing the sedimentation of SPM within the device. The retention rates of particles in sedimentation boxes depend on various factors such as the flow velocity, the SPM size and density, but precise information remains scarce. Therefore, we performed laboratory tests to assess the retention rates of the polymers polystyrene and polyethylene and analyzed the dependency of sedimentation on the flow velocity and particle sizes. The quantification of MP in samples collected by sedimentation boxes underestimates the concentration of smaller-sized particles due to their lower retention rate, and MP concentrations should be reported accordingly. Subsequently, we carried out a series of field experiments with sedimentation boxes and showed that MP can be retained from different water bodies with diverse characteristics. Due to their robust sampling mechanism, sedimentation boxes are promising devices for time-integrated, long-term sampling of MP.
More Papers Like This
Sediment trapping as a method for monitoring microplastic flux rates and deposition at aquatic environments
AI summary Read the abstract
This study evaluated sediment traps as a monitoring tool for measuring microplastic flux rates and deposition patterns in aquatic environments, finding they capture a representative cross-section of settling particles. Researchers found that trap design and deployment duration significantly affect collection efficiency and particle size distribution.
Efficiency of five samplers to trap suspended particulate matter and microplastic particles of different sizes
AI summary Read the abstract
This study compared the efficiency of five different samplers for collecting suspended particulate matter and microplastics from rivers and lakes, evaluating which designs provide the most representative samples for quantitative chemical and microplastic analysis.
Is There a Difference in Yield? A Comparative Analysis of Microplastics Sampling Techniques in River Water with a Low-Velocity Flow
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared three microplastic sampling techniques in low-velocity river water, quantifying differences in particle abundance and characteristics to evaluate which method most accurately captures microplastic concentrations in surface water environments.
Evaluation of microplastics sediment sampling techniques—efficiency of common methods and new approaches
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested how well common sediment sampling tools capture microplastics in riverbeds and found that standard grab samplers and corers lose fine, low-density particles — the very type that microplastics tend to be. A combination of methods is needed for accurate measurements, and freeze coring shows promise as a more reliable future technique.
Microplastics in Stormwater: Sampling and Methodology Challenges
AI summary Read the abstract
Stormwater runoff washes microplastics from roads, lawns, and urban surfaces directly into streams and rivers, but measuring this pathway consistently has been hampered by a lack of standardized sampling methods. This study collected stormwater sediment samples from control measures across multiple U.S. regions and found that conventional sampling tools designed for chemical contaminants are poorly suited for capturing the full range of microplastic sizes and shapes. The results call for purpose-built sampling protocols for stormwater microplastics to improve the reliability of pollution monitoring.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.