We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Efficiency of five samplers to trap suspended particulate matter and microplastic particles of different sizes
Summary
This study compared the efficiency of five different samplers for collecting suspended particulate matter and microplastics from rivers and lakes, evaluating which designs provide the most representative samples for quantitative chemical and microplastic analysis.
Suspended particulate matter (SPM) plays a major role in nutrient cycles and for the transport of pollutants within local and transboundary water catchments. Obtaining representative SPM samples from rivers, lakes, inland and coastal waters is crucial for quantitative and qualitative chemical analyses to correctly describe the chemical status of a water body. However, a representative sampling of SPM over time is challenging due to the heterogeneity of SPM particles sizes, their non-uniform distribution in rivers, and a variety of sampling devices being in use. Therefore, we investigated the efficiencies of five different sampling devices commonly used in national and international monitoring programs to collect representative SPM samples. We tested three passive sedimentation-based samplers (SBSs: sedimentation box, SB; sedimentation tank, ST; Raetz Sampler, RS), and two active separation techniques (continuous flow centrifuge, CFC; vacuum filtration, VF) in an experimental laboratory setup using in-house SPM standard suspensions (mineral, organic, and microplastic particles) with defined particle sizes. The mass-based efficiencies of the three examined SBSs were 0-66% for the mineral and organic particles <75 μm, where the mean particle sizes of collected samples were always shifted to bigger sizes compared to the initial suspensions. The efficiencies of the three SBSs to collect microplastic particles <80 μm were <20% due to the lower densities of microplastic compared to organic and mineral particles. In contrast to the SBSs, VF and CFC units showed excellent efficiencies >86% for all tested materials, with similar particle size distributions of the sampled material compared to those of the inlet suspensions. In conclusion, SPM sampling efficiencies of sampling units have to be carefully considered and compared to the respective aims of the monitoring approaches, especially when statements are derived from quantitative results on SPM.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Is There a Difference in Yield? A Comparative Analysis of Microplastics Sampling Techniques in River Water with a Low-Velocity Flow
Researchers compared three microplastic sampling techniques in low-velocity river water, quantifying differences in particle abundance and characteristics to evaluate which method most accurately captures microplastic concentrations in surface water environments.
Microplastics in Stormwater: Sampling and Methodology Challenges
Stormwater runoff washes microplastics from roads, lawns, and urban surfaces directly into streams and rivers, but measuring this pathway consistently has been hampered by a lack of standardized sampling methods. This study collected stormwater sediment samples from control measures across multiple U.S. regions and found that conventional sampling tools designed for chemical contaminants are poorly suited for capturing the full range of microplastic sizes and shapes. The results call for purpose-built sampling protocols for stormwater microplastics to improve the reliability of pollution monitoring.
Development and testing of a fractionated filtration for sampling of microplastics in water
Researchers developed and tested a fractionated filtration system for sampling microplastics in water bodies, proposing a standardized sampling concept that accounts for plastic-specific properties to improve comparability of microplastic data across different studies and environments.
Surface Water Monitoring with Sedimentation Boxes: Assessing the Sampling Performance and Its Effect on Microplastic Concentration
This study tested whether passive "sedimentation box" samplers — devices that slow water flow to settle out suspended particles — can effectively capture microplastics from surface waters over time, rather than relying on infrequent spot sampling with nets or pumps. Results showed the boxes reliably retained a range of particle sizes and types, and their performance aligned with the physical behavior of other suspended particles in water. Passive samplers like these could help create more consistent, time-integrated microplastic monitoring that better captures the true variability of plastic pollution in rivers and lakes.
Identification and quantification of microplastic particles in drinking water treatment sludge as an integrative approach to determine microplastic abundance in a freshwater river
Researchers used drinking water treatment plant sludge as an integrative sampler to estimate microplastic abundance in a freshwater river over extended periods, capturing larger water volumes than conventional net or filtration methods. The approach improves representativeness of microplastic occurrence data in flowing water bodies.