0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Surface Chemistry Shapes Nanoplastic Mixture Responses in Developing Amniote Embryos

AI summary Read the abstract

Chicken embryos were exposed to tiny plastic particles with different surface charges, alone and mixed together. Low doses affected growth and brain development, and brain tests showed each particle type triggered different biological changes, with the mixture causing more gene changes but not worse physical effects.

Polymers
Body Systems

Abstract Nanoplastics (NPs) are an emerging environmental concern, yet their developmental impacts on terrestrial amniotes and their mixture effects are only beginning to be understood. Using a chicken embryo model, we compared the developmental and molecular effects of negatively charged (PS-COOH), positively charged (PS-NH2), and their equal-component mixture (50 nm). No significant mortality was observed across 0.1 to 10 ppm, whereas the lowest tested concentration (0.1 ppm) impaired growth and brain development without significantly increasing mortality. An IA-informed reference-response comparison showed that mixture effects were generally attenuated relative to reference responses derived from the experimentally tested single-particle treatments. Brain transcriptomic and proteomic analyses revealed distinct surface-chemistry-dependent responses: PS-COOH primarily affected extracellular matrix and glycan-related processes, whereas PS-NH2 altered synaptic, immune, and protein-quality-control pathways. The mixture induced the greatest number of DEGs; this broader omics response does not translate into higher phenotypic toxicity. DIABLO identified treatment-associated RNA-protein covariance, while reference-response comparisons indicated predominantly attenuated molecular responses among statistically supported deviations. Our findings demonstrate that coexposure to oppositely functionalized nanoplastics can reshape developmental and molecular responses during embryonic development.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Surface functionalisation-dependent adverse effects of metal nanoparticles and nanoplastics in zebrafish embryos

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used high-throughput zebrafish embryo imaging to show that surface functionalization determines the toxicity of metal nanoparticles and nanoplastics, with surface charge and coating chemistry more predictive of hatching failure and malformation rates than particle composition alone.

Article Tier 2

Towards a better understanding of protein affinity for polystyrene nanoplastics: Investigation of surface charge effects, interaction mechanisms and aggregation kinetics

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists found that tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) interact very differently with proteins in our blood depending on their electrical charge: positively charged particles bind proteins and clump together, while negatively charged ones stay separate. This matters because how these plastic particles behave in our body, whether they clump or spread out, could affect how they travel through blood and tissues, an important step in understanding their health risks.

Article Tier 2

Charge-specific adverse effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on zebrafish (Danio rerio) development and behavior

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed developing zebrafish to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the positively charged particles were significantly more toxic, accumulating in the brain and gut and causing developmental delays and brain cell death. The two types of nanoplastics affected different neurotransmitter pathways and interacted with different brain receptors, explaining their distinct behavioral effects. The study demonstrates that the surface charge of nanoplastics plays a critical role in determining their toxicity to developing organisms.

Article Tier 2

Differentially Charged Nanoplastics Induce Distinct Effects on the Growth and Gut of Benthic Insects (Chironomus kiinensis) via Charge-Specific Accumulation and Perturbation of the Gut Microbiota

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed aquatic insect larvae to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the surface charge significantly affected how toxic the particles were. Positively charged nanoplastics caused more severe gut damage, greater accumulation in tissues, and bigger disruptions to gut bacteria. This matters because nanoplastics in the real environment carry various charges, and the findings suggest that charge is an important factor in determining health risks.

Article Tier 2

Recent advances in toxicological research of nanoplastics in the environment: A review

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers systematically reviewed nanoplastic toxicology, finding that surface charge and particle size are the dominant determinants of harm — positively charged and smaller particles penetrate cell membranes more readily — and that adsorbed contaminants released inside organisms often pose greater toxicological risks than the nanoplastic particles themselves.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper