We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Towards a better understanding of protein affinity for polystyrene nanoplastics: Investigation of surface charge effects, interaction mechanisms and aggregation kinetics
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) interact very differently with proteins in our blood depending on their electrical charge: positively charged particles bind proteins and clump together, while negatively charged ones stay separate. This matters because how these plastic particles behave in our body, whether they clump or spread out, could affect how they travel through blood and tissues, an important step in understanding their health risks.
This study investigates the mechanisms governing nanoplastic-protein interactions, aggregation, and colloidal stability between bovine serum albumin (BSA) and polystyrene nanoplastics (PS NPls) with opposite surface charges under controlled conditions at pH 7.4. Positively charged amidine latex (180 ± 20 nm) and negatively charged sulfate latex (220 ± 20 nm) PS NPls were characterized over pH 3 - 10, then studied in ultrapure water (UPW) and 10 mM HEPES. When BSA concentration was varied at fixed PS NPls concentration (30 mgL −1 ), cationic PS NPls (+) rapidly adsorbed BSA, inducing charge neutralization and aggregation at low BSA (≈ 4 mg L −1 ) through reduced electrostatic repulsion and protein bridging. At higher BSA concentration (20 mg L −1 ), surface saturation led to protein corona formation, charge inversion, and colloidal restabilization. Anionic PS NPls (–) remained dispersed, with no detectable aggregation or charge inversion by DLS and ζ-potential. In a BSA-rich model system (50 mg L −1 ) with varying PS NPls concentrations, low cationic PS NPls concentrations (< 4 mg L -1 ) produced stable BSA aggregates, while higher concentrations (> 4 mg L −1 ) yielded well-dispersed corona-coated particles. These interaction states formed rapidly and remained stable over 48 h. PS NPls (–) showed no significant interaction or kinetic evolution. Similar trends in UPW and HEPES indicate that ionic screening modulated but did not alter the charge-dependent mechanisms. Together, these findings highlight the central role of surface charge in controlling PS NPls-protein interactions and provide a mechanistic basis for future studies in complex biological media.
More Papers Like This
Characteristics of protein corona formation on the surface of micro- and nanoplastics and their effects on cellular uptake and transport
AI summary Read the abstract
When tiny plastic particles get into our bodies, blood proteins quickly coat their surface, and this coating changes how the particles behave. This study found that the plastic's size and electrical charge affect how much protein sticks to it, which in turn influences whether cells absorb the particles and how much damage they might cause. Notably, positively charged plastic particles were more toxic and better at slipping past the body's protective barriers, suggesting that not all microplastics pose equal risk.
Preferred Lung Accumulation of Polystyrene Nanoplastics with Negative Charges
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated why certain nanoplastics preferentially accumulate in the lungs after entering the bloodstream. They found that negatively charged polystyrene nanoplastics attract specific blood proteins that promote uptake by lung blood vessel cells through a receptor-mediated pathway. The study suggests that the protein coating nanoplastics acquire in the blood plays a critical role in determining where they end up in the body.
The influence of nanoplastics' surface charge on the formation of protein corona and the subsequent sorption of Cd2 + and Pb2+ ions
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated how protein corona formation on positively and negatively charged polystyrene nanoplastics affected the subsequent adsorption of cadmium and lead ions, finding that surface charge influenced glycoprotein adsorption but that protein-coated particles from both charge types accumulated similar heavy metal loads in human serum.
Effects of size and surface charge on the sedimentation of nanoplastics in freshwater
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated how size and surface charge of polystyrene nanoplastics affect their sedimentation behavior in freshwater, finding that both properties significantly influence aggregation dynamics and settling rates, with implications for predicting nanoplastic fate in aquatic environments.
Surface Charges of Polystyrene Nanoplastics Affect Their Distribution in Mice
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers administered polystyrene nanoplastics of different sizes and surface charges intravenously to mice and tracked their biodistribution. Negatively charged nanoplastics accumulated more in the liver and spleen, while positively charged particles showed broader tissue distribution, demonstrating that surface charge is a key determinant of where nanoplastics end up in the body.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.