0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Personal exposure to microplastics and PAHs in PM2.5: Personal vs. outdoor assessment and health risks

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Bo Fu, Xingnan Ye, Yuanqiao Zhou, Jinshui Che, Weijie Huang, Jianmin Chen

Summary

Researchers measured personal exposure to airborne microplastics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fine particulate matter in Shanghai, China. They found that personal microplastic exposure levels were more than three times higher than outdoor levels, suggesting that indoor environments are a significant source. The study highlights that people may be inhaling more microplastics than previously estimated, particularly from indoor sources like textiles and household items.

Microplastics (MPs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are pervasive emerging pollutants in the environment, raising growing concerns about their adverse health effects. However, research on characterizing MPs in fine particulate matter (PM) remains scarce due to methodological challenges. This study quantified human exposure to MPs and PAHs in PM in Shanghai, a megacity in China, using pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) and GC/MS, respectively. The average concentration of personal exposure MPs reached 2.27 ± 2.31 μg m, which appeared to be higher than outdoor levels (0.69 ± 0.58 μg m). Polyethylene (PE) was the dominant polymer in both environments, with personal exposure samples exhibiting higher proportions of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polystyrene (PS). Relative humidity had a significant impact on outdoor MP concentrations, whereas personal exposure MP levels were primarily affected by indoor sources and ventilation conditions. In contrast, the average concentration of outdoor PAHs (45.76 ± 35.02 ng m) was 50 % higher than the personal one (30.67 ± 8.67 ng m). A significant positive correlation between polypropylene (PP) and low-molecular-weight PAHs suggests potential adsorption or common sources. Estimated daily intake (EDI) assessment revealed higher exposure levels to MPs than PAHs, underscoring the urgent need for an in-depth understanding of inhalable MPs/NPs and their additives.

Share this paper