0
Article Sign in to save

The Hidden Cost of Global Trade: Evidence from Plastic Waste Trade and Its Ecological Ramifications Across Major Waste-Trading Nations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers analyzed plastic waste trade and its environmental consequences across 20 major trading nations, finding that plastic waste imports significantly increase ecological footprints and greenhouse gas emissions, while results support the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis showing environmental damage initially rises with GDP growth before declining at higher income thresholds.

The rapid expansion of plastic waste trade has intensified environmental pressures, accelerating ecosystem degradation and climate change. We examine the long-term impacts of plastic waste imports and domestic waste production on ecological footprints and greenhouse gas emissions across 20 countries representing 70% of global plastic waste trade and 45% of world GDP. Under the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) framework, we explore nonlinear interactions among economic growth, urbanization, and sustainability goals. Using a panel simultaneous equations approach, we apply Pedroni, Kao, and Westerlund cointegration tests and Fully Modified and Dynamic OLS estimators to address endogeneity and heterogeneity. Robustness checks include alternative environmental indicators and the Dumitrescu–Hurlin panel causality test. Results demonstrate a stable long-run equilibrium: plastic waste imports substantially increase ecological footprints and emissions, while progress on sustainable development goals mitigates some damage. The negative GDP squared coefficient supports the EKC hypothesis, indicating that environmental impacts rise initially with growth but decline once income exceeds a threshold. These findings highlight the need for stronger international regulations, enhanced waste management infrastructures, and circular economy strategies. Focused investment in sustainable technologies and global cooperation is essential to lower environmental costs of plastic waste trade.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Is the Plastic Waste Trade a Barrier to Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence From RCEP Countries

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers analyzed three decades of plastic waste trade data from nine RCEP nations and found that both importing and exporting plastic waste consistently harms sustainable development outcomes, with statistically significant negative effects concentrated at medium-to-high quantile levels of national development.

Article

Assessing the importance of the Indonesian plastic waste imports to industrial growth and the environment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined the effects of Indonesia's relaxed plastic waste import ban and found little evidence that imported plastic waste benefits the country's recycling industry, suggesting that most imported plastic goes untreated — indicating the policy fails both environmental and economic development goals while effectively offloading waste from developed nations.

Article

Assessing the Importance of the Indonesian Plastic Waste Imports to Industrial Growth and the Environment

AI summary Read the abstract

This study analyzes Indonesia's plastic waste import trade, finding that the country imported around 200 million kg of plastic waste in 2022 — primarily from developed nations — while its waste management infrastructure remains severely undercapacity, shifting environmental burdens onto local ecosystems and communities.

Article Tier 2

Traded Plastic, Traded Impacts? Designing Counterfactual Scenarios to Assess Environmental Impacts of Global Plastic Waste Trade

AI summary Read the abstract

This study used life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of global plastic waste trade in 2022 across 18 countries. The research found that trading plastic waste internationally resulted in lower overall environmental impacts compared to countries processing all their waste domestically, partly because importing countries have higher recycling rates. However, the benefits depend heavily on actual recycling rates, and the trade can shift pollution burdens to lower-income countries.

Article

The impact of china’s ban on plastic waste exporting countries

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers analyzed how China's 2018 ban on plastic waste imports restructured global recycling trade flows from 2008–2024, identifying three country groups—resilient, partially adapted, and market losers—and finding that nations less dependent on China adapted more successfully to the fragmented, technologically differentiated recycling landscape that followed.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper