We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Is the Plastic Waste Trade a Barrier to Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence From RCEP Countries
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed three decades of plastic waste trade data from nine RCEP nations and found that both importing and exporting plastic waste consistently harms sustainable development outcomes, with statistically significant negative effects concentrated at medium-to-high quantile levels of national development.
ABSTRACT There is widespread consensus on the threats that plastic waste poses to the environment. A significant obstacle to sustainable development, the trade in plastic waste may contribute to plastic pollution. The objective of this research is to look at how the import and export of plastic waste affect the sustainable development of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) countries. The research analyzed data from nine RCEP nations from 1992 to 2022, and the Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) technique was employed for analysis. The study also investigated the impact of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, food security, and globalization on sustainable development in RCEP countries. The research used Hickel's (2020) Sustainable Development Index as a sustainable development metric. Panel Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) and Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) methods were adopted as robustness tests. Additionally, the research makes use of the Dumitrescu‐Hurlin panel causality test. The analysis reveals statistically significant results indicating that exports of plastic waste in RCEP nations negatively impact sustainable development at medium (0.50, 0.60) and high quantile levels (0.70, 0.80, 0.90). Furthermore, the research discovered that imports of plastic waste have a negative effect on sustainable development in RCEP nations; the results for medium (0.40, 0.50, 0.60) and high quantile levels (0.70, 0.80, 0.90) are statistically significant. The results demonstrate that the trade in plastic waste has a negative impact on RCEP nations' sustainable development. The results were taken into consideration while developing policy suggestions.
More Papers Like This
Assessing the importance of the Indonesian plastic waste imports to industrial growth and the environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined the effects of Indonesia's relaxed plastic waste import ban and found little evidence that imported plastic waste benefits the country's recycling industry, suggesting that most imported plastic goes untreated — indicating the policy fails both environmental and economic development goals while effectively offloading waste from developed nations.
The Evolutionary Trend and Impact of Global Plastic Waste Trade Network
AI summary Read the abstract
Analysis of the global plastic waste trade network from 1988 to 2017 found that recent national import bans have reshaped trade flows, with waste being redirected from China to other developing nations rather than reducing overall plastic waste generation.
Global Plastic Waste Trade: An Analysis of Sources and Trends (1996-2024)
AI summary Read the abstract
The global trade in plastic waste — where wealthy nations ship plastic scraps to poorer ones for processing — has shaped recycling systems worldwide, but its sustainability is deeply contested. This bibliometric review of 257 academic papers (1996–2024) maps the research landscape, finding that China's 2018 ban on importing foreign plastic waste was a dominant topic, and that the trade raises serious concerns about environmental harm and economic inequality in recipient countries. The study underscores that international plastic waste flows are not a straightforward solution to the plastic crisis and require much closer scrutiny.
The consequences of trade on global plastic pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
By combining plastic waste generation data with global trade commodity data, researchers found that plastic waste exported from high-income countries and mismanaged in lower-income nations contributes 1.2 million metric tons of additional plastic to aquatic environments annually, increasing prior estimates of high-income country contributions by 51% for freshwater and 100% for marine environments. The findings reveal that international waste trade is a major underestimated driver of global plastic and microplastic pollution.
Traded Plastic, Traded Impacts? Designing Counterfactual Scenarios to Assess Environmental Impacts of Global Plastic Waste Trade
AI summary Read the abstract
This study used life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of global plastic waste trade in 2022 across 18 countries. The research found that trading plastic waste internationally resulted in lower overall environmental impacts compared to countries processing all their waste domestically, partly because importing countries have higher recycling rates. However, the benefits depend heavily on actual recycling rates, and the trade can shift pollution burdens to lower-income countries.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.