0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Biodegradable microplastics exacerbate the risk of antibiotic resistance genes pollution in agricultural soils

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 63 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Dan Zhang, Dan Zhang, Jianbin Sun, Shuang Peng, Yiming Wang, Xiangui Lin, Shanshan Wang

Summary

This study found that biodegradable plastics (PLA and PBAT), often promoted as eco-friendly alternatives, actually increased antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural soil more than conventional plastics like polyethylene. The biodegradable plastics promoted the growth of bacteria that carry resistance genes and enhanced the ability of these genes to spread between organisms. These findings challenge the assumption that switching to biodegradable plastics will reduce environmental and health risks in farming.

Body Systems

The widespread emergence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) poses a severe global health threat, exacerbated by agricultural practices such as fertilization and plastic mulch use. While biodegradable plastics are promoted as environmentally friendly alternatives to conventional plastics, their ecological impact on soil ARGs remains poorly understood. This study conducted incubation experiments using soils with distinct long-term fertilization histories (no fertilization CK, chemical fertilizer CF, and pig manure PM) collected from 14-year field experiment sites at Changshu National Agro-Ecosystem Observation and Research Station. The soils were exposed to four types of microplastics (conventional: polyethylene [PE] and polyvinyl chloride [PVC]; biodegradable: polylactic acid [PLA] and polybutylene adipate terephthalate [PBAT]), and the ARGs and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) were quantified using high-throughput quantitative PCR, targeting 329 ARG subtypes and 34 MGEs. Results revealed that PM soil exhibited the highest ARGs abundance, and exposure to biodegradable microplastics (PLA and PBAT) further enriched ARGs by 21.5 % and 47.9 %, respectively. Microplastic exposure enhanced horizontal gene transfer potential by strengthening ARG-MGE co-occurrence, and altered bacterial communities by promoting the proliferation of generalist taxa (e.g., Proteobacteria) identified as key hosts of risk ARGs. These findings challenge the assumption of biodegradable plastics as environmentally friendly, demonstrating their potential to exacerbate ARGs pollution in agricultural soils. This study provides critical insights into the interactive effects of fertilization and microplastic exposure on the soil resistome, with implications for plastic management and ARGs risk control in agroecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Potential environmental risks of field bio/non-degradable microplastic from mulching residues in farmland: Evidence from metagenomic analysis of plastisphere

Researchers analyzed the microbes living on biodegradable and conventional plastic mulch fragments in farm soil and found that both types harbored antibiotic resistance genes and disease-causing bacteria, including human pathogens. Surprisingly, the biodegradable plastic (PBAT/PLA) had a higher diversity and abundance of resistance genes than conventional polyethylene. This challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are always safer and raises concerns about antibiotic resistance spreading from farm microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradable microplastics show greater potential than conventional types in facilitating antibiotic resistance gene enrichment and transfer through viral communities

Researchers compared how conventional and biodegradable microplastics affect viral communities and antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural soils and found that biodegradable plastics posed a greater risk. Biodegradable microplastics significantly enriched high-risk antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements regardless of fertilizer type, while conventional microplastics had more limited effects. The study challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are inherently safer for soil ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Assessment of the Effects of Biodegradable and Nonbiodegradable Microplastics Combined with Pesticides on the Soil Microbiota

This study compared how biodegradable PLA and conventional PET microplastics, combined with common pesticides, affect soil microbial communities. Researchers found that PLA microplastics significantly increased microbial diversity but also enriched potentially harmful bacteria and elevated antibiotic resistance gene abundance more than PET, suggesting biodegradable plastics may pose underappreciated ecological risks in agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

Effects of microplastics on dissipation of oxytetracycline and its relevant resistance genes in soil without and with Serratia marcescens: Comparison between biodegradable and conventional microplastics

This study found that biodegradable plastic (PBAT) microplastics actually slowed the breakdown of the antibiotic oxytetracycline in soil more than conventional polyethylene microplastics did, and both types promoted the spread of antibiotic resistance genes. This matters for human health because antibiotic-resistant bacteria from contaminated soils can eventually reach people through food or water.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradable microplastics induced the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors in soil: A metagenomic perspective

Researchers found that biodegradable microplastics promoted the spread of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors in soil at levels comparable to conventional microplastics, challenging assumptions about their environmental safety.

Share this paper