We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Expanding life cycle impact assessment to account for marine plastic emissions: a case study for the fishing industry
AI summary Read the abstract
Incorporating dissipative plastic emissions into life cycle assessment of anchoveta and cod fishing showed that entanglement and microplastic impacts on biota can dominate ecosystem quality damage scores, particularly for gillnet-caught cod. This work advances LCIA methodology to better capture the full ecological cost of fishing-related plastic pollution, a major but historically underrepresented impact pathway.
Fishing is a major source of plastic pollution, which is harmful to marine life. Life cycle assessment studies do not usually include plastic emissions in their inventory or impact assessment. There has been a recent surge of methodological development to include plastic impacts in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). This study of anchoveta and cod fishing included dissipative plastic emissions in the inventory data and tests currently available characterisation factors for plastic pollution impacts to identify their importance for ecosystem quality damage. Life cycle inventory (LCI) data was gathered for two systems that produce 1 tonne of fish product (anchoveta fishmeal, consumer packaged cod). LCIA calculations were performed using IMPACT World+ to calculate ecosystem quality damage. In addition, plastic impact pathways for the physical effects from microplastics on biota (both water and sediment-dwelling organisms) and entanglement were included. The fishing stage dominates the ecosystem quality (EQ) damage results for both systems. For cod fished with gillnets, production of antifouling coating is the dominant contributor. Entanglement results completely dominate the picture for anchoveta. Overall, freshwater ecotoxicity (long term) causes the largest overall EQ damage. The emissions that contribute the most to freshwater ecotoxicity (long term) are metals from fishing gear production (mainly associated with the lead in the bottom rope), followed by polyethylene production for the cod system. For anchoveta, production of phosphoric acid and iron sulphate for fishmeal processing contribute the most. The second most important impact category is climate change (long term), due to emissions of fossil-derived carbon dioxide, as well as refrigerant R500 for anchoveta. Even with 100% fragmentation into microplastics, physical effects on biota account for less than 0.1% of the total EQ damage. Including the impacts associated with plastic emissions is important in LCAs where plastic materials or products are used. Without the inclusion of the plastic impacts, LCAs will not capture all of the impacts that plastics can have on the ecosystem. This study shows that whether parts, or the whole of the gear (including ropes) are included affects the importance of the mismanaged waste losses in the value chain, as well as the microplastic impacts associated with fishing gear losses at sea. The timescale for when lost fishing gear can still entangle organisms is extremely important for the overall damage caused by fishing and should be investigated further.
More Papers Like This
Life cycle inventory of plastics losses from seafood supply chains: Methodology and application to French fish products
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a life cycle inventory methodology for quantifying plastic losses from seafood supply chains, applying it to French fish products to identify key stages where plastic enters the environment from fishing through retail.
Plastic litter in life cycle assessment: Advances of the marine impacts in life cycle assessment international taskforce and application to case studies
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed advances in incorporating marine plastic litter impacts into life cycle assessment, focusing on recently developed indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem quality. The new indicators allow LCA practitioners to account for plastic pollution when comparing product systems and informing design choices.
Plastic litter in life cycle assessment: Advances of the marine impacts in life cycle assessment international taskforce and application to case studies
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examined advances in incorporating marine plastic litter impacts into life cycle assessment, addressing the long-standing gap in LCA methodology for accounting for plastic pollution as an environmental impact category. Recent progress by the MarILCA research group was highlighted as bringing LCA closer to properly reflecting biodiversity and ecosystem impacts from plastic waste.
Methodology to address potential impacts of plastic emissions in life cycle assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers proposed a new method for including the environmental impact of plastic emissions in life cycle assessments, which currently tend to make plastic products appear less harmful than alternatives. The approach introduces characterization factors based on how long different plastics persist in the environment. The study suggests that accounting for plastic pollution in these assessments could significantly change how the environmental footprint of plastic products is evaluated.
Modeling marine microplastic emissions in Life Cycle Assessment: characterization factors for biodegradable polymers and their application in a textile case study
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed new methods for measuring the environmental impact of biodegradable plastic microplastic emissions using life cycle assessment. They found that microplastic degradation rates may be overestimated when based on data from larger plastic pieces, and that microplastic emissions could account for up to 30% of the total environmental impact in a textile case study. The work aims to improve the accuracy of environmental comparisons between conventional and biodegradable materials.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.