0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Plastic litter in life cycle assessment: Advances of the marine impacts in life cycle assessment international taskforce and application to case studies

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2024 Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Anne-Marie Boulay, Anne-Marie Boulay, Ian Vázquez Rowe, Francesca Verones

Summary

This review examined advances in incorporating marine plastic litter impacts into life cycle assessment, addressing the long-standing gap in LCA methodology for accounting for plastic pollution as an environmental impact category. Recent progress by the MarILCA research group was highlighted as bringing LCA closer to properly reflecting biodiversity and ecosystem impacts from plastic waste.

Even though marine litter, especially plastic, is viewed as an important threat to biodiversity, life cycle assessment (LCA) was late to implement any indicators allowing the consideration of this important hazard. Without these emissions included, LCA is not adequately supporting decision making with respect to plastic use and potential alternatives, and what seems like environmental solutions to the plastic problem may in fact generate more impacts on the environment. After the publication of a first framework detailing the assessment of marine plastic litter in life cycle impact assessment, the Marine Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment (MarILCA) working group has made concrete advancements in various stages of the impact modelling. Characterization factors, translating emissions flows into potential environmental impacts, were proposed in 2023 and now updated, to characterize the ecosystem damages caused by physical effects of microplastic emissions of 16 polymers, 5 sizes and 3 shapes, and applied to different case studies. Pathways associated to human health impacts from microplastics emissions are being quantified and while results are available for some polymers, challenges remain for others. This research proposes an overview of the advancements made on the quantification of the different building blocks of the impact pathways leading to damages on biodiversity and human health associated with plastic emissions in the environment, the challenges that remain, and how the results can affect decision making of plastic-based products and their alternatives when included in life cycle assessments of diverse applications including packaging, textiles, fisheries and agricultural uses. Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559631/document

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Plastic litter in life cycle assessment: Advances of the marine impacts in life cycle assessment international taskforce and application to case studies

Researchers reviewed advances in incorporating marine plastic litter impacts into life cycle assessment, focusing on recently developed indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem quality. The new indicators allow LCA practitioners to account for plastic pollution when comparing product systems and informing design choices.

Article Tier 2

Towards a meaningful assessment of marine ecological impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA)

Researchers reviewed how life cycle assessment (LCA) methods — used to quantify industrial environmental impact — currently lack adequate indicators for marine biodiversity loss, and identified pathways to build quantitative cause-effect models for seven major ocean stressors including plastic debris, ocean acidification, and seabed damage.

Systematic Review Tier 1

It is time to develop characterization factors for terrestrial plastic pollution impacts on ecosystems in life cycle impact assessment – a systematic review identifying knowledge gaps

Researchers reviewed how plastic pollution is — and is not — accounted for in life cycle assessments (LCAs), which are tools used to measure a product's full environmental footprint. They found that while ocean plastic impacts have been partially modeled, freshwater and terrestrial plastic pollution, including microplastics, are still missing from standard environmental impact calculations, leaving a major blind spot in sustainability analysis.

Article Tier 2

The capabilities and deficiencies of life cycle assessment to address the plastic problem

This review critically evaluates the capabilities and limitations of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a tool for understanding the full environmental impacts of plastics across their supply chain, from production through end-of-life disposal. The authors argue that LCA can contextualize plastic impacts relative to alternative materials and reveal invisible environmental costs throughout the plastic life cycle, while also identifying key deficiencies in current LCA methodology for addressing plastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Strategies for efficient management of microplastics to achieve life cycle assessment and circular economy

This review examines strategies for managing microplastic waste through a circular economy and life cycle assessment (LCA) lens, arguing that current recycling practices and waste disposal methods are inadequate given the sheer volume of plastics entering ecosystems. The authors propose a conceptual framework integrating LCA principles into microplastic management to better quantify ecological risks and guide more sustainable plastic use policies.

Share this paper