We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A systematic review of micro- and nanoplastics impact on plant photosynthesis
AI summary Read the abstract
A systematic review with quantitative analysis found that micro- and nanoplastics reduce plant chlorophyll by a median of 8–12% and impair gas exchange, with polystyrene particles at 0.1–1 µm causing the strongest effects, and carotenoids showing even greater sensitivity in aquatic plants. These photosynthetic disruptions across crop and wild plant species indicate that soil and water microplastic contamination poses a measurable threat to agricultural productivity and terrestrial carbon fixation.
Despite rapidly growing research activity, the effects of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) on plant photosynthesis remain inconsistently described, with major discrepancies across species, particle types, sizes, and experimental conditions. Current literature lacks an integrated synthesis that identifies general physiological patterns and quantifies the magnitude of MNP-induced disruptions. To address this gap, this review combines a structured literature review with quantitative evaluation of extracted experimental data to assess MNP-induced changes in photosynthetic pigments, gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence, as well as associated metabolic and genetic responses. Our data analysis shows that PS was the most frequently reported polymer, followed by PE, PVC, PET, PP, and PES, while plant representation was dominated by Poaceae and Cucurbitaceae. Chlorophyll declined most strongly under 0.1-1 µm particles at high concentrations and under PS exposure, with median reductions of 8 and 12%, reflecting disruptions in pigment synthesis, degradation, and thylakoid damage. Carotenoids proved even more sensitive, showing the largest decreases under > 100 µm particles, high concentrations, and PS treatments, particularly in aquatic systems, yet they also displayed occasional stimulation at low doses, consistent with their dual role in both protection and photochemistry. Gas-exchange responses pointed to biochemical limitations at high MNP levels, with PS again exerting the strongest suppression of stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis. Among fluorescence parameters, ETR emerged as the most sensitive indicator of MNP stress. The review concludes by shedding light on the possibilities that may help alleviate impact of MNPs and pointing toward the studies still needed to fully understand how MNPs alter photosynthetic function.
More Papers Like This
Nano- and microplastics commonly cause adverse impacts on plants at environmentally relevant levels: A systematic review
AI summary Read the abstract
Systematic review of 78 studies found that nano- and microplastics commonly cause adverse effects on plants even at environmentally relevant concentrations, with germination and root growth more strongly affected than shoot growth during early development. Chlorophyll levels were consistently reduced while stress indicators (ROS) and antioxidant enzymes were consistently upregulated across species.
Microplastics as emerging stressors in plants: biochemical and metabolic responses
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how microplastics act as environmental stressors in plants, disrupting biochemical and metabolic processes including photosynthesis, antioxidant defenses, and nutrient uptake, with effects varying by polymer type, particle size, and concentration.
Toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on plants: A global meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis of 101 studies found that micro- and nanoplastics negatively affect plant physiology, with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) showing the strongest impact on fresh weight, chlorophyll, and reactive oxygen species. Microplastics inhibited most growth and photosynthetic indicators more strongly than nanoplastics, and exposure consistently triggered increased biochemical stress enzyme activity.
Micro and nanoplastics pollution: Sources, distribution, uptake in plants, toxicological effects, and innovative remediation strategies for environmental sustainability
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how microplastics and nanoplastics enter plants through roots, disrupt growth and photosynthesis, and cause oxidative stress that reduces crop yields. Because these plastic particles can move through plant tissues and into edible parts, they represent a potential pathway for microplastics to enter the human food supply.
Bioavailability and phytotoxicity of micro/nanoplastics to aquatic plants: Trends, environmental drivers and mechanisms
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis found that micro- and nanoplastics cause significant harm to aquatic plants, reducing their biomass and chlorophyll content through oxidative stress. Polyethylene was especially damaging, cutting plant biomass by over 42%. When plastic pollution harms the base of aquatic food chains, the effects can ripple upward through ecosystems that support both wildlife and human food sources.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.