0
Article Sign in to save

Influence of Treatment Technology and Sampling Methodology on Microplastic Abundance and Characteristics: A Comparative Study of Three Sewage Treatment Plants in Penang, Malaysia

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared microplastic removal across three Malaysian sewage treatment plants and found all achieved high removal efficiencies (92–99%), though treatment technology and sampling methodology significantly influenced measured concentrations, polymer types, and particle morphology in both influent and effluent samples.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics (MPs) enter sewage treatment plants (STPs) primarily through domestic wastewater, yet their removal is often incomplete and strongly influenced by treatment processes, making these facilities important pathways for MP release into the environment. This study quantifies MP concentrations, characteristics, and evaluates removal efficiencies across all treatment units of three STPs in Malaysia employing extended aeration (STP-1), a sequencing batch reactor (STP-2), and a mechanized oxidation ditch system (STP-3). Across facilities, influent MP concentrations varied significantly between plants and sampling methods (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.05), with volume-reduced samples, yielding higher values: 10.33 ± 1.53, 10.24 ± 3.86, and 5.67 ± 3.29 MPs/L in STP-1, STP-2, and STP-3, respectively. Effluent concentrations were uniformly low, ranging from 0.06 ± 0.02–0.13 ± 0.13 MPs/L (STP-1), 0.01 ± 0.01–0.08 ± 0.14 MPs/L (STP-2), and 0.03 ± 0.02–0.21 ± 0.07 MPs/L (STP-3), with no significant differences among plants (Kruskal–Wallis test, p > 0.05), indicating comparable overall performance. Removal efficiencies were highest in STP-2 (99.07–99.92%), followed by STP-1 (97.06–99.42%) and STP-3 (92.49–99.53%), underscoring the influence of treatment technology. Fibers, fragments, and foams were the dominant MP shapes, while polymers such as polypropylene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, low-density polyethylene, styrene acrylonitrile, polyethylene terephthalate, high-impact polystyrene, high-density polyethylene, water-soluble polyurethane, and polystyrene reflected diverse community‑level plastic usage. Catchment characteristics influenced MP concentration, morphology, and polymer distribution, whereas sampling methodology exerted strong and systematic effects on all measured parameters, with volume-reduced sampling consistently capturing higher concentrations and greater shape and polymer diversity.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics Monitoring in an Extended Aeration Sewage Treatment Plant in Malaysia: Abundance, Characteristics, Removal and Environmental Emission

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that a Malaysian sewage treatment plant removed about 89% of incoming microplastics, but still released between 2.4 and 4.7 million microplastic particles per day into a local river. Synthetic fibers were the most common type detected, suggesting laundering of synthetic clothing is a major contributor even after treatment.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence, Fate, and Removal of Microplastics in Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs)

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed how sewage treatment plants handle microplastics, finding that while these facilities remove a large fraction from wastewater, they also concentrate microplastics in sewage sludge that is then spread on agricultural land — potentially transferring plastic pollution from water to soil and food systems.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Occurrence, Fate and Mitigation Strategies

AI summary Read the abstract

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are major conduits for microplastics into the environment, yet even advanced treatment systems fail to fully remove the smallest particles before discharge. Understanding microplastic fate across treatment stages is essential for developing targeted mitigation strategies that reduce the tonnage of plastic particles entering rivers, soils, and ultimately the food supply.

Article Tier 2

Evaluation of Microplastic Abundance and Removal in Wastewater Treatment Plant Processes

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated how effectively wastewater treatment plants remove microplastics before releasing water into the environment, finding that while some removal occurs, treatment plants were never designed for this purpose and remain a significant pathway for microplastics to enter aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Detection of Microplastic in Wastewater Treatment Plants

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated microplastic detection methods in wastewater treatment plants, finding that while these facilities capture a significant fraction of microplastics, they also concentrate and potentially redistribute particles and co-contaminants into aquatic environments through effluent and biosolids.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper