0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Evaluating Cellular Effects of PET Microplastics in 2D/3D Models: Methodological Considerations of Reagent Interference

2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lisa Aichinger, Kristina Duswald, Doris Pakusic, Lukas Kogler, Lukas Kogler, Sarah Luise Stellnberger, Verena Karl, Matea Stojanovic, Dominik Wenisch, Michael A. Jakupec, C. Philippe, Lukas Kenner, Markus Brandstetter, Verena Pichler

Summary

Researchers assessed the cellular effects of PET microplastics using both 2D and 3D cell culture models and found dose- and cell-type-dependent reductions in viability along with rapid generation of reactive oxygen species. The study highlights significant methodological challenges, as microplastics can interfere with common lab assays through light scattering, dye adsorption, and surface interactions, potentially producing misleading results without appropriate controls.

Polymers

Abstract Despite the widespread environmental contamination by micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs), the cellular toxicity of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) particles is poorly understood. Here, we assessed pristine PET-Microplastic particles (MPs) (diameter: 1.24 ± 0.52 µm) and fluorescently labeled PET-MPs (Fluo-PET, diameter: 1.25 ± 0.97 µm) in both 2D (monolayer cultures) and 3D models (multicellular spheroids) across different mammalian cell types. PET exposure caused dose- and cell type–dependent reductions in cell viability at concentrations of 2.5–5 µg/ml, with uptake rates of up to 16%. In 3D models, optical photothermal infrared spectroscopy (O-PTIR) enabled the detection and biodistribution analysis of non-labeled particles, highlighting its value as a polymer-specific, label-free technique. Short-term exposure (10 min – 120 min) induced rapid, concentration-dependent ROS generation across all cell types, while reactive nitrogen species (RNS) levels remained unchanged. Due to numerous potential interferences, particular attention was given to identifying artifacts caused by MP interactions with conventional assays, including plastic-plate interferences due to MP adsorption during spheroid formation, distortions in fluorescence-based assays due to light scattering, dye adsorption, or surfactant effects, all of which can yield false-positive or false-negative results if appropriate controls are not implemented. Our findings emphasize the importance of accounting for such artifacts and interferences, and the need to report and discuss these effects explicitly. In summary, PET particles induce significant cytotoxicity and oxidative stress, which is confirmed after correction for experimental artifacts.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

An inverse cell culture model for floating plastic particles

Scientists developed an "inverse cell culture" model using floating plastic particles to better simulate how marine organisms interact with buoyant microplastics, addressing a technical challenge in lab-based toxicity testing. This novel experimental approach could improve the relevance of in vitro studies for understanding real-world microplastic exposures.

Article Tier 2

In Vitro High-Throughput Toxicological Assessment of Nanoplastics

Researchers developed a high-throughput in vitro method to assess nanoplastic toxicity, finding that laser-ablated polycarbonate and PET nanoparticles showed greater cellular uptake and toxicity than nanoprecipitated PET, highlighting how production method affects nanoplastic hazard.

Review Tier 2

Can the impact of micro- and nanoplastics on human health really be assessed using in vitro models? A review of methodological issues

This review examines whether lab-based cell studies can reliably predict how micro and nanoplastics affect human health. The authors found significant inconsistencies in how researchers choose plastic particle types, doses, and exposure methods, making it hard to compare results across studies. The paper calls for standardized testing protocols so that lab findings can more accurately reflect real-world microplastic exposure risks to people.

Article Tier 2

Evaluation of potential toxicity of polyethylene microplastics on human derived cell lines

Researchers tested the toxic effects of two sizes of polyethylene microplastics on human cell lines representing different tissue types. They found that microplastic exposure triggered inflammatory responses and caused cellular damage, with effects varying depending on particle size and cell type. The findings suggest that microplastics commonly encountered in everyday life could pose health risks when they interact with human tissues.

Article Tier 2

Comparison of cell viability assays for evaluating the cytotoxicity of HDPE microparticles in Tetrahymena thermophila (Protozoa, Ciliata)

Researchers compared multiple cell viability assay methods for evaluating the cytotoxicity of high-density polyethylene microplastics, addressing the need for harmonized testing protocols given that different assays can yield contradictory results. The comparison identified assay-specific interferences caused by plastic particles and recommended best practices for cytotoxicity testing.

Share this paper