0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Evaluation of the impact of polylactide microparticles on soil biota

Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 53 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ewa Liwarska-Bizukojć

Summary

Researchers evaluated the environmental impact of polylactide (PLA) bioplastic microparticles on soil organisms using earthworms and plants as bioindicators. They found that while PLA microparticles did not affect earthworm survival, they reduced reproductive capacity by approximately 50% at concentrations of 2.5% and above. The study suggests that even biodegradable bioplastics can have measurable ecological effects on soil organisms, particularly on earthworm reproduction.

Polymers
Body Systems

Polylactide (PLA) is a bioplastic produced in the largest quantities in the world in the recent years. The forecast of the global production capacities of bioplastics indicates that this phenomenon will be continued at least until 2028. Therefore, it is very important to extend the knowledge and collect the data about the possible impacts of PLA on the environment. In this work the ecotoxicity tests towards individual organisms and the multispecies tests in the small terrestrial model ecosystem (STME) were used in order to estimate the effect of PLA microparticles (MPs) on the biotic part of the terrestrial compartment. Earthworms and plants representing the most important functional groups of soil biota were employed as bioindicators in these tests. The mortality and body mass of the earthworm Eisenia andrei were not affected even at the concentration of PLA MPs equal to 12.5% w/w but its reproduction ability decreased by about half (from 50 to 51.8%) at the concentrations of PLA 2.5% w/w and 12.5% w/w in the soil. Cress was more sensitive than other plants used in the evaluation of the effect of microplastics on plant growth, and it is recommended to use cress in the future ecotoxicological studies on bioplastics. The application of the STME which mimics the functionality of the terrestrial ecosystem occurred to be the valuable development and supplementation of the basic ecotoxicological tests towards the individual species. In the STME tests containing PLA MPs at the concentration of 2.5% w/w, the avoidance behaviour of earthworms, i.e. the downward movement of most of them (from 60 to 80%), was observed. It indicates that the contamination of soil by microplastics implies dangerous effects on soil invertebrates.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Short-Term Effect of Poly Lactic Acid Microplastics Uptake by Earthworms, Eudrilus eugeniae.

Researchers tested whether earthworms (Eudrilus eugeniae) would ingest polylactic acid (PLA) biodegradable microplastics when mixed with organic matter, finding they did but with reduced weight gain and reproductive output at higher concentrations. This suggests even biodegradable microplastics can harm soil organisms, which are essential for nutrient cycling and soil health.

Article Tier 2

The comparison effect on earthworms between conventional and biodegradable microplastics

Researchers compared the effects of conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics on earthworms over an extended exposure period. They found that biodegradable microplastics caused comparable or even greater harm than conventional plastics at certain concentrations, including reduced growth and reproduction. The findings challenge the assumption that biodegradable plastics are inherently safer for soil organisms.

Article Tier 2

Short- and medium-term effects of biodegradable microplastics (PLA and PHB) on earthworm development and reproduction

Researchers tested whether biodegradable plastics (PLA and PHB) are truly safer for soil organisms than conventional polyethylene by exposing earthworms to all three types of microplastics. While none caused immediate harm or death, both PLA and conventional polyethylene reduced earthworm reproduction over medium-term exposure, producing fewer cocoons and offspring. This challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are environmentally harmless and suggests they may pose similar risks to soil ecosystems as conventional plastics.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradable polymers boost reproduction in the earthworm Eisenia fetida

This study compared how conventional plastics and biodegradable polymers affect earthworms in soil. Surprisingly, biodegradable plastics like PLA and PBAT boosted earthworm reproduction, likely because soil microbes can partially break them down into usable carbon sources. However, conventional plastics like polystyrene and PET had neutral to negative effects, highlighting that not all microplastics impact soil organisms the same way.

Article Tier 2

Responses of earthworms exposed to low-density polyethylene microplastic fragments

Researchers exposed earthworms to low-density polyethylene microplastic fragments at various concentrations and studied the effects on their survival, growth, and reproduction. The microplastics affected earthworm behavior and caused measurable changes depending on concentration and exposure time. Since earthworms are critical for soil health and nutrient cycling, their sensitivity to microplastics raises concerns about how plastic pollution may degrade agricultural soils.

Share this paper