0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Is there any consistency between the microplastics found in the field and those used in laboratory experiments?

Environmental Pollution 2015 506 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Catherine Mouneyrac, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Catherine Mouneyrac, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Fabienne Lagarde Nam Ngoc Phuong, Fabienne Lagarde Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Laurence Poirier, Laurence Poirier, Amélie Châtel, Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Amélie Châtel, Amélie Châtel, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Laurence Poirier, Abderrahmane Kamari, Abderrahmane Kamari, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Abderrahmane Kamari, Abderrahmane Kamari, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Abderrahmane Kamari, Abderrahmane Kamari, Catherine Mouneyrac, Fabienne Lagarde Abderrahmane Kamari, Abderrahmane Kamari, Abderrahmane Kamari, Abderrahmane Kamari, Abderrahmane Kamari, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Catherine Mouneyrac, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Catherine Mouneyrac, Amélie Châtel, Laurence Poirier, Amélie Châtel, Abderrahmane Kamari, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Catherine Mouneyrac, Fabienne Lagarde Laurence Poirier, Catherine Mouneyrac, Laurence Poirier, Amélie Châtel, Laurence Poirier, Laurence Poirier, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Catherine Mouneyrac, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Laurence Poirier, Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Nam Ngoc Phuong, Nam Ngoc Phuong, Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Amélie Châtel, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Amélie Châtel, Amélie Châtel, Catherine Mouneyrac, Laurence Poirier, Laurence Poirier, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Amélie Châtel, Laurence Poirier, Laurence Poirier, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Catherine Mouneyrac, Fabienne Lagarde Catherine Mouneyrac, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Catherine Mouneyrac, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Amélie Châtel, Amélie Châtel, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, Amélie Châtel, Fabienne Lagarde Laurence Poirier, Fabienne Lagarde

Summary

This study compared the types of microplastics found in field samples with those used in laboratory toxicity tests, finding major inconsistencies in polymer type, size, and shape. The mismatch raises concerns that most lab-based toxicity studies may not accurately predict the effects of microplastics in real environmental conditions.

The ubiquitous presence and persistency of microplastics (MPs) in aquatic environments are of particular concern since they represent an increasing threat to marine organisms and ecosystems. Great differences of concentrations and/or quantities in field samples have been observed depending on geographical location around the world. The main types reported have been polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene. The presence of MPs in marine wildlife has been shown in many studies focusing on ingestion and accumulation in different tissues, whereas studies of the biological effects of MPs in the field are scarce. If the nature and abundance/concentrations of MPs have not been systematically determined in field samples, this is due to the fact that the identification of MPs from environmental samples requires mastery and execution of several steps and techniques. For this reason and due to differences in sampling techniques and sample preparation, it remains difficult to compare the published studies. Most laboratory experiments have been performed with MP concentrations of a higher order of magnitude than those found in the field. Consequently, the ingestion and associated effects observed in exposed organisms have corresponded to great contaminant stress, which does not mimic the natural environment. Medium contaminations are produced with only one type of polymer of a precise sizes and homogenous shape whereas the MPs present in the field are known to be a mix of many types, sizes and shapes of plastic. Moreover, MPs originating in marine environments can be colonized by organisms and constitute the sorption support for many organic compounds present in environment that are not easily reproducible in laboratory. Determination of the mechanical and chemical effects of MPs on organisms is still a challenging area of research. Among the potential chemical effects it is necessary to differentiate those related to polymer properties from those due to the sorption/desorption of organic compounds.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper