0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Is there any consistency between the microplastics found in the field and those used in laboratory experiments?

Environmental Pollution 2015 506 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This study compared the types of microplastics found in field samples with those used in laboratory toxicity tests, finding major inconsistencies in polymer type, size, and shape. The mismatch raises concerns that most lab-based toxicity studies may not accurately predict the effects of microplastics in real environmental conditions.

The ubiquitous presence and persistency of microplastics (MPs) in aquatic environments are of particular concern since they represent an increasing threat to marine organisms and ecosystems. Great differences of concentrations and/or quantities in field samples have been observed depending on geographical location around the world. The main types reported have been polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene. The presence of MPs in marine wildlife has been shown in many studies focusing on ingestion and accumulation in different tissues, whereas studies of the biological effects of MPs in the field are scarce. If the nature and abundance/concentrations of MPs have not been systematically determined in field samples, this is due to the fact that the identification of MPs from environmental samples requires mastery and execution of several steps and techniques. For this reason and due to differences in sampling techniques and sample preparation, it remains difficult to compare the published studies. Most laboratory experiments have been performed with MP concentrations of a higher order of magnitude than those found in the field. Consequently, the ingestion and associated effects observed in exposed organisms have corresponded to great contaminant stress, which does not mimic the natural environment. Medium contaminations are produced with only one type of polymer of a precise sizes and homogenous shape whereas the MPs present in the field are known to be a mix of many types, sizes and shapes of plastic. Moreover, MPs originating in marine environments can be colonized by organisms and constitute the sorption support for many organic compounds present in environment that are not easily reproducible in laboratory. Determination of the mechanical and chemical effects of MPs on organisms is still a challenging area of research. Among the potential chemical effects it is necessary to differentiate those related to polymer properties from those due to the sorption/desorption of organic compounds.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Reflection on the utilization of microplastics as experiment material in laboratory

AI summary Read the abstract

This perspective paper analyzed 204 microplastics toxicology studies and found significant mismatches between the types of microplastics used as experimental materials and those actually found in the environment. The authors argue that using ecologically unrealistic plastic types and concentrations in lab experiments limits the ability to draw meaningful conclusions about real-world risks.

Article Tier 2

Environmental Microplastic Particles vs. Engineered Plastic Microparticles—A Comparative Review

AI summary Read the abstract

This review compared environmental microplastic particles with engineered plastic microparticles used in laboratory studies, revealing significant discrepancies in size, shape, and polymer type that may limit the ecological relevance of current exposure research.

Article Tier 2

Are we really producing environmentally relevant reference materials for microplastic studies?

AI summary Read the abstract

This study critically evaluated whether current laboratory-produced microplastic reference materials adequately represent the properties of microplastics found in real environments, examining particle morphology, chemical composition, and surface characteristics. Significant gaps were identified between commercially available reference materials and environmentally relevant particles, limiting the ecological realism of ecotoxicology studies.

Article Tier 2

Are we really producing environmentally relevant reference materials for microplastic studies?

AI summary Read the abstract

This study evaluated whether laboratory-produced microplastic reference materials used in research adequately represent the physical and chemical properties of particles found in natural environments. Results found substantial differences between commercially available reference materials and environmentally weathered microplastics, undermining the ecological relevance of studies using pristine materials.

Article Tier 2

How Relevant Is the Accumulated Research on Commercial Spherical Nano- and Microplastics?

AI summary Read the abstract

A critical review asked how relevant research using commercial spherical plastic beads (a common lab standard) is to the irregularly shaped microplastics found in real environments. The analysis finds significant mismatches between lab model particles and environmental microplastics, urging more ecologically realistic experimental designs.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper