0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Comparison of Various Plastics Wastes Using X-ray Fluorescence

American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing 2017 24 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Faten Adel Ismael Chaqmaqchee

Summary

This study used X-ray fluorescence analysis to compare the elemental composition of different types of plastic waste, finding characteristic elemental profiles that could help sort plastics by resin type for recycling. Improved sorting of plastic waste is important for increasing recycling rates and reducing the fraction that ends up as environmental microplastic contamination.

Plastics production is increased recently due to their various applications such as construction, electronic, packaging and others. The rising in plastics demand lead to developed of recycling and energy recovery method to control plastic wastes. Recycling process is needs to be arranged according to resins, colors and transparency of all plastics. Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) was developed for the determination of the chemical composition in different plastics materials (with resin identification code) of PETE (1) or PET (01), HDPE (2) or PE-HD (02), V (3) or PVC (03), LDPE (4) or PE-LD, PP (5) or PP (06), PS (6) or PS (06) and Others (7) or O (07). XRF was measured elements such as Si, S, Cl, Fr, Ca, Ti, V, Fe, Cu, Zn, As, Kr, Zr, Nb, Mo and Nb in both kα and kβ lines, where PP with high percentage in both PET and PVC plastics, which is highly hazardous. In addition, chemical compositions in percentages were detected for various plastics materials.

Share this paper