We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Nile Red Staining as a Subsidiary Method for Microplastic Quantifica-tion: A Comparison of Three Solvents and Factors Influencing Application Reliability
Summary
Researchers compared three solvents — acetone, chloroform, and n-hexane — for Nile Red fluorescent staining of microplastics across multiple polymer types and post-consumer materials, finding chloroform most effective with an 83.3% recovery rate, though the method falls short of the reliability of Raman or FTIR spectroscopy.
The quantification of microplastics is a challenging task to the scientific community, especially as the existing analytical methods limit sample numbers due to difficulties associated with high expenses and time consuming procedures.Quantifying microplastics by staining with Nile Red can be helpful in distinguishing these particles from other inorganic (e.g.sediment) or organic (e.g.plant material) matter.In the present study, the benefits of acetone, chloroform and nhexane as extraction solvents for Nile Red staining were investigated.For this study, various polymer types, namely highdensity and low-density polyethylene (HDPE, LDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyamide (PA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and cellulose acetate (CA), several post-consumer products (freezing bag, bottle cap, plastic bottle, styrofoam, fishing line, food container, pipe and cigarette butt) as well as biogenic material (algae, hard plant material, soft plant material) were used as test materials.Results indicated chloroform to be the most suitable solvent achieving recovery rates of 83.3% for the group of HDPE, LDPE, PP and PVC being the most demanded polymer types in Europe.However, the proposed method does not reach the reliable quantification capabilities of Raman-spectroscopy or Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.Nevertheless, it can aid the assessment of microplastic abundances.In conclusion, staining with Nile Red does not require expensive equipment and allows the quick evaluation of a large number of samples for the assessment of microplastics.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Nile Red Staining as a Subsidiary Method for Microplastic Quantifica-tion: A Comparison of Three Solvents and Factors Influencing Application Reliability
This study evaluated Nile Red fluorescent staining as a method for quantifying microplastics in environmental samples, comparing it to traditional identification techniques. The approach can help distinguish microplastics from organic particles more quickly and cost-effectively, supporting higher-throughput microplastic analysis in environmental monitoring programs.
Dyeing to Know: Harmonizing Nile Red Staining Protocols for Microplastic Identification
Researchers systematically evaluated eight carrier solvents for Nile Red fluorescence staining to improve microplastic identification and classification. The study identified an acetone-water mixture as the optimal solvent, balancing strong fluorescence performance with minimal polymer degradation, and demonstrated that Fenton oxidation effectively eliminated false-positive fluorescence from natural organic materials.
Dyeing to Know: Optimizing Solvents for Nile Red Fluorescence in Microplastics Analysis
Researchers investigated how the choice of solvent affects Nile Red fluorescence staining for microplastic identification, optimizing solvent conditions to improve the reliability of fluorescence-based classification of microplastic polymer types in environmental samples.
Analyzing microplastics with Nile Red: Emerging trends, challenges, and prospects
This review evaluates the Nile Red staining technique as an analytical method for identifying and quantifying microplastics in environmental samples. The study concludes that while Nile Red has emerged as a viable low-cost alternative to visual identification for microplastics research, not everything that fluoresces is plastic, so additional spectroscopic analysis is needed to validate results.
Dyeing to Know: Harmonising Nile Red Staining Protocols for Microplastic Identification
Researchers tested eight carrier solvents for Nile Red fluorescence staining of ten common microplastic polymer types to identify which combinations best distinguish MPs. Carrier solvent choice significantly affected fluorescence behavior and classification accuracy, identifying specific solvent-polymer combinations that optimize MP identification—a step toward harmonizing the widely used but unstandardized Nile Red staining protocol.