Back to papers
0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Combined Effects of UV Exposure Duration and Mechanical Abrasion on Microplastic Fragmentation by Polymer Type

Environmental Science & Technology 2017 1424 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Gi Myung Han, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Mi Jang, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Mi Jang, Won Joon Shim Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Mi Jang, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Gi Myung Han, Mi Jang, Young Kyoung Song, Gi Myung Han, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Gi Myung Han, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Mi Jang, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Gi Myung Han, Won Joon Shim Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Mi Jang, Gi Myung Han, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Young Kyoung Song, Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Young Kyoung Song, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Gi Myung Han, Young Kyoung Song, Mi Jang, Gi Myung Han, Sang Hee Hong, Seung‐Won Jung, Seung‐Won Jung, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Gi Myung Han, Mi Jang, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Mi Jang, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Gi Myung Han, Mi Jang, Mi Jang, Gi Myung Han, Won Joon Shim Gi Myung Han, Gi Myung Han, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim

Summary

Researchers studied how UV exposure duration and mechanical abrasion combine to fragment different plastic types under simulated beach conditions. They found that polypropylene was far more susceptible to fragmentation than polyethylene after UV weathering, while expanded polystyrene broke apart readily even without UV exposure. The experiments showed that a large fraction of fragmented particles were too small to recover, suggesting that significant amounts of nanoplastic are being generated on beaches.

Polymers
LDPE PE PP PS
Study Type Environmental

It is important to understand the fragmentation processes and mechanisms of plastic litter to predict microplastic production in the marine environment. In this study, accelerated weathering experiments were performed in the laboratory, with ultraviolet (UV) exposure for up to 12 months followed by mechanical abrasion (MA) with sand for 2 months. Fragmentation of low-density polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and expanded polystyrene (EPS) was evaluated under conditions that simulated a beach environment. PE and PP were minimally fragmented by MA without photooxidation by UV (8.7 ± 2.5 and 10.7 ± 0.7 particles/pellet, respectively). The rate of fragmentation by UV exposure duration increased more for PP than PE. A 12-month UV exposure and 2-month MA of PP and PE produced 6084 ± 1061 and 20 ± 8.3 particles/pellet, respectively. EPS pellets were susceptible to MA alone (4220 ± 33 particles/pellet), while the combination of 6 months of UV exposure followed by 2 months of MA produced 12,152 ± 3276 particles/pellet. The number of fragmented polymer particles produced by UV exposure and mechanical abrasion increased with decreasing size in all polymer types. The size-normalized abundance of the fragmented PE, PP, and EPS particles according to particle size after UV exposure and MA was predictable. Up to 76.5% of the initial EPS volume was unaccounted for in the final volume of pellet produced particle fragments, indicating that a large proportion of the particles had fragmented into undetectable submicron particles.

Read via DOI

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper

Post Share Share Pin Email