We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Assuring quality in microplastic monitoring: About the value of clean-air devices as essentials for verified data
AI summary Read the abstract
This study developed a practical method for quantifying background microfiber contamination introduced during laboratory sample processing, arguing that clean-air devices and contamination controls are essential for reliable microplastic analysis. Without accounting for lab-introduced fibers, environmental contamination levels can be significantly overestimated.
Avoiding aerial microfibre contamination of environmental samples is essential for reliable analyses when it comes to the detection of ubiquitous microplastics. Almost all laboratories have contamination problems which are largely unavoidable without investments in clean-air devices. Therefore, our study supplies an approach to assess background microfibre contamination of samples in the laboratory under particle-free air conditions. We tested aerial contamination of samples indoor, in a mobile laboratory, within a laboratory fume hood and on a clean bench with particles filtration during the examining process of a fish. The used clean bench reduced aerial microfibre contamination in our laboratory by 96.5%. This highlights the value of suitable clean-air devices for valid microplastic pollution data. Our results indicate, that pollution levels by microfibres have been overestimated and actual pollution levels may be many times lower. Accordingly, such clean-air devices are recommended for microplastic laboratory applications in future research work to significantly lower error rates.
More Papers Like This
Prioritizing Suitable Quality Assurance and Control Standards to Reduce Laboratory Airborne Microfibre Contamination in Sediment Samples
AI summary Read the abstract
Airborne microfibers from the laboratory environment can contaminate samples during microplastic analysis, leading to inflated counts. This study evaluated contamination control measures and recommends specific quality assurance standards to improve data reliability.
How can contamination be prevented during laboratory analysis of atmospheric samples for microplastics?
AI summary Read the abstract
This study tested various laboratory practices to reduce contamination when measuring microplastics in air samples, finding that working under laminar flow reduced background contamination compared to fume hoods or open lab environments. Pre-treating filters by heating them to 450 degrees Celsius cut microplastic counts by 50%, and pre-filtering solutions was essential since working liquids themselves were contaminated. These quality control findings are critical because without proper contamination prevention, studies on airborne microplastics may significantly overcount or misidentify particles.
Potential sources of microplastic contamination in laboratory analysis and a protocol for minimising contamination
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists identified multiple sources of microplastic contamination that can be accidentally introduced during laboratory analysis of biological samples, including from lab water, chemicals, and air. By filtering reagents, pre-treating glass fiber filters, and using a clean working environment, they reduced lab-introduced contamination by 70–100%. These findings are important for accurate microplastic research: without such precautions, studies can significantly overestimate how much plastic is actually present in animal tissues or environmental samples.
Contamination issues as a challenge in quality control and quality assurance in microplastics analytics
AI summary Read the abstract
This review evaluated contamination control practices in 50 microplastic research studies and found that most only followed about 4 out of 10 recommended quality control measures. Since microplastics are present everywhere including indoor air, inadequate precautions can lead to sample contamination and overestimation of environmental concentrations. The study proposes seven specific measures to improve result quality and reliability in future microplastic sampling and analysis.
Assessment of quality control measures in the monitoring of microplastic: a critical review
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a critical review of quality control measures used in microplastic monitoring studies, evaluating eight key quality control parameters across 30 published studies. The review found that strict quality control protocols are essential for accurate microplastic detection, as small-sized particles and microfibers can easily be introduced as contaminants from ambient air, sampling equipment, and laboratory environments during the monitoring process.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.