We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Assessment of quality control measures in the monitoring of microplastic: a critical review
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a critical review of quality control measures used in microplastic monitoring studies, evaluating eight key quality control parameters across 30 published studies. The review found that strict quality control protocols are essential for accurate microplastic detection, as small-sized particles and microfibers can easily be introduced as contaminants from ambient air, sampling equipment, and laboratory environments during the monitoring process.
Microplastics usually refer to solid plastic particles with particle size less than 5 mm. As a new type of pollutant unavoidable produced during human production and living activities, microplastics affect the ecological environment and human health safety. Since microplastics are widely distributed, small-sized microplastics and microfibers may be introduced from ambient air, sampling equipment and laboratory equipment during various monitoring process. Strict quality control measures were required to ensure the accuracy of monitoring results. In order to evaluate the compliance of quality control measures adopted in current researches, eight quality control parameters were statistically summarized by reviewing 30 published researches involving microplastic quality control methods. The results showed that those eight quality control measures could not be fully covered in most studies and uniform standardization of some key quality control measures have not been achieved. It was suggested to develop standardized operational protocols and perform cross-calibration among laboratories.
More Papers Like This
Contamination issues as a challenge in quality control and quality assurance in microplastics analytics
AI summary Read the abstract
This review evaluated contamination control practices in 50 microplastic research studies and found that most only followed about 4 out of 10 recommended quality control measures. Since microplastics are present everywhere including indoor air, inadequate precautions can lead to sample contamination and overestimation of environmental concentrations. The study proposes seven specific measures to improve result quality and reliability in future microplastic sampling and analysis.
Development of screening criteria for microplastic particles in air and atmospheric deposition: critical review and applicability towards assessing human exposure
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers evaluated 27 studies on microplastics in air and found that most scored below 50% on quality criteria — particularly for contamination controls and measuring particles smaller than 10 micrometers — highlighting the need for standardized methods before reliable human inhalation exposure assessments can be made.
Prioritizing Suitable Quality Assurance and Control Standards to Reduce Laboratory Airborne Microfibre Contamination in Sediment Samples
AI summary Read the abstract
Airborne microfibers from the laboratory environment can contaminate samples during microplastic analysis, leading to inflated counts. This study evaluated contamination control measures and recommends specific quality assurance standards to improve data reliability.
Taking control of microplastics data: A comparison of control and blank data correction methods
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared six commonly used methods for correcting microplastic data using procedural controls and blanks, finding significant variability in results depending on the correction method chosen and highlighting the urgent need for standardized data quality protocols.
Microplastics are overestimated due to poor quality control of reagents
AI summary Read the abstract
This study demonstrated that inadequate quality control of chemical reagents used in microplastic analysis can introduce contamination that leads to systematic overestimation of microplastic concentrations in environmental samples, highlighting a critical methodological flaw in the field.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.