0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

How can contamination be prevented during laboratory analysis of atmospheric samples for microplastics?

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2024 59 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This study tested various laboratory practices to reduce contamination when measuring microplastics in air samples, finding that working under laminar flow reduced background contamination compared to fume hoods or open lab environments. Pre-treating filters by heating them to 450 degrees Celsius cut microplastic counts by 50%, and pre-filtering solutions was essential since working liquids themselves were contaminated. These quality control findings are critical because without proper contamination prevention, studies on airborne microplastics may significantly overcount or misidentify particles.

Microplastics (MPs) in the air and indoor environments are of growing concern and have led to increased testing for MPs. This study draws attention to the quality and quantitative measures of MP studies by conducting laboratory experiments (on solutions, filters, and blank samples) that were rarely or were not adopted in the airborne and indoor MP literature. Experiments have been conducted to identify contaminations that may come from experimental procedures while determining MPs in the air samples. MPs in different matrices during experiments were counted and categorized by their shapes. Chemical characterization was performed by Raman Spectroscopy. Results showed that laminar flow is the best option over a fume hood or standard laboratory environment for detecting air MPs to reduce blank levels. Blue-green and Black-Grey were the dominant colors; fiber was the predominant type of MPs seen, and most of them fall under the size range from (1-1000 µm) in different indoor environments and blanks. Common MPs seen were PP, PVA, PTFE, PVC, and HDPE. Thermal treatment of fresh unused filters at 450 °C for 4 h was effective as it reduced the MP count by 50%. Working solutions are mainly contaminated, and their pre-filtration is essential. The average deposition of MPs in blank samples during seven days was around 55 MPs. There is an urgent need for studies on developing quality control and quality assurance of airborne and indoor MPs. Hence, a standard protocol needs to be accepted; by harmonizing procedures, comparable results can be found, uncovering the correct levels of MP contamination, as required for risk assessment.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Contamination issues as a challenge in quality control and quality assurance in microplastics analytics

AI summary Read the abstract

This review evaluated contamination control practices in 50 microplastic research studies and found that most only followed about 4 out of 10 recommended quality control measures. Since microplastics are present everywhere including indoor air, inadequate precautions can lead to sample contamination and overestimation of environmental concentrations. The study proposes seven specific measures to improve result quality and reliability in future microplastic sampling and analysis.

Article Tier 2

Prioritizing Suitable Quality Assurance and Control Standards to Reduce Laboratory Airborne Microfibre Contamination in Sediment Samples

AI summary Read the abstract

Airborne microfibers from the laboratory environment can contaminate samples during microplastic analysis, leading to inflated counts. This study evaluated contamination control measures and recommends specific quality assurance standards to improve data reliability.

Article Tier 2

Assuring quality in microplastic monitoring: About the value of clean-air devices as essentials for verified data

AI summary Read the abstract

This study developed a practical method for quantifying background microfiber contamination introduced during laboratory sample processing, arguing that clean-air devices and contamination controls are essential for reliable microplastic analysis. Without accounting for lab-introduced fibers, environmental contamination levels can be significantly overestimated.

Article Tier 2

Potential sources of microplastic contamination in laboratory analysis and a protocol for minimising contamination

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists identified multiple sources of microplastic contamination that can be accidentally introduced during laboratory analysis of biological samples, including from lab water, chemicals, and air. By filtering reagents, pre-treating glass fiber filters, and using a clean working environment, they reduced lab-introduced contamination by 70–100%. These findings are important for accurate microplastic research: without such precautions, studies can significantly overestimate how much plastic is actually present in animal tissues or environmental samples.

Article Tier 2

To what extent are we really free from airborne microplastics?

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers assessed quality assurance methods for reducing airborne microplastic contamination during laboratory analysis, finding that washing experimental glassware removed 88-98% of airborne microplastics while ashing achieved 100% removal efficiency. The study demonstrates that ashing is the more reliable decontamination method and highlights the critical need for QA/QC protocols to ensure reliable microplastic data.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper