0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Volunteer microplastic sampling in Puget Sound: strategies for broad inclusion, education, and research

Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) 2018 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Kathryn A. Davis

Summary

This paper describes a volunteer microplastic sampling program in Puget Sound, Washington, examining strategies for community participation and data quality in citizen science monitoring of marine plastic pollution. The program demonstrates how broad public involvement can generate spatially extensive environmental data at low cost.

Study Type Environmental

The global plastic crisis contributes 8 million metric tons of plastic to the world’s oceans each year, equivalent to dumping one garbage truck every minute. This plastic does not break down. Instead, it breaks up into smaller and smaller pieces. Today, “microplastics” (plastic pieces smaller than 5 mm in size) can be found nearly everywhere on earth. Microplastics enter waterbodies from other sources as well. “Microbeads,” commonly used as an exfoliant, are found in facial scrubs, hand soap and toothpaste. “Microfibers” shed from fleece and other synthetic materials when washed. Wastewater treatment plants do not have the capacity to trap most microbeads and microfibers, so many are discharged into waterways. Once in the water column, microplastics act like chemical sponges that may bind toxic compounds including DDTs, PCBs, pesticides, and pathogens. When ingested, these contaminants have the potential to enter the food web, including seafood destined for human consumption. To better understand local microplastic distribution, volunteers recruited through Puget Soundkeeper collected 43 water samples from throughout the Puget Sound basin during the fall of 2017. These water samples will be analyzed through a partnership between Puget Soundkeeper, University of Puget Sound and Unleash the Brilliance. Nearly all samples are expected to contain plastic, primarily in the form of microfibers. The results will inform future monitoring stations and the project provides a successful example of an accessible citizen science program that achieves educational and research goals as well as broad inclusion. Lessons learned include strategies for streamlining data collection, distributing sampling equipment across a large geographic area, and preserving data integrity.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Citizen science sampling programs as a technique for monitoring microplastic pollution: results, lessons learned and recommendations for working with volunteers for monitoring plastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems

Volunteers monitored microplastic contamination along 550 km of the Ottawa River in Canada using a standardized method, finding microplastics at almost every sampling site. Citizen science programs like this show promise for scaling up microplastic monitoring at low cost.

Article Tier 2

Making citizen science count: Best practices and challenges of citizen science projects on plastics in aquatic environments

This paper reviews best practices and challenges for citizen science projects focused on plastic pollution in aquatic environments, finding that while citizen science can effectively gather large-scale data and raise public awareness, data quality and consistency remain significant challenges.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Pollution Projects and Participatory Science

This paper discusses citizen science and participatory science projects for monitoring microplastic pollution, reviewing methodological approaches, data quality considerations, and the potential for large-scale pollution mapping through public engagement.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Citizen Science for Monitoring Plastic Pollution from Source to Sea: A Systematic Review of Methodologies, Best Practices, and Challenges

This systematic review examines how citizen science programs track plastic pollution from land to sea. The research found that while public participation greatly expands data collection, inconsistent methods and data quality issues limit the scientific usefulness of the results. Better-designed citizen science programs could help communities monitor and respond to the microplastic pollution in their local environments.

Article Tier 2

The sampling and analysis of coastal microplastic and mesoplastic: Development of a citizen science approach

This study designed, developed, and tested a citizen science approach to microplastic and mesoplastic data collection on coastal beaches to address scale and coverage limitations of traditional research methods. Results showed non-expert participants could collect comparable data to researchers, expanding monitoring capacity across undersampled coastlines.

Share this paper