0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Citizen Science for Monitoring Plastic Pollution from Source to Sea: A Systematic Review of Methodologies, Best Practices, and Challenges

Water 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Elisa Pignoni, Corinne Corbau, Vlatka Filipović Marijić Oliver Bajt, Corinne Corbau, Elisa Pignoni, Oliver Bajt, Corinne Corbau, Tatjana Simčić, Corinne Corbau, Alexandre Lazarou, Tatjana Simčić, Oliver Bajt, Corinne Corbau, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Tatjana Simčić, Tatjana Simčić, Tatjana Simčić, Tatjana Simčić, Alexandre Lazarou, Vlatka Filipović Marijić Umberto Simeoni, Umberto Simeoni, Tatjana Simčić, Umberto Simeoni, Oliver Bajt, Corinne Corbau, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Corinne Corbau, Oliver Bajt, Vlatka Filipović Marijić Massimo Coltorti, Massimo Coltorti, Oliver Bajt, Oliver Bajt, Tatjana Simčić, Vlatka Filipović Marijić Elisa Pignoni, Corinne Corbau, Oliver Bajt, Umberto Simeoni, Massimo Coltorti, Corinne Corbau, Vlatka Filipović Marijić

Summary

This systematic review examines how citizen science programs track plastic pollution from land to sea. The research found that while public participation greatly expands data collection, inconsistent methods and data quality issues limit the scientific usefulness of the results. Better-designed citizen science programs could help communities monitor and respond to the microplastic pollution in their local environments.

Study Type Review

Citizen science provides a valuable approach for tracking plastic pollution; however, its effectiveness is often limited by methodological inconsistencies, concerns about data quality, and a persistent gap between data collection and policy implementation. This systematic review addresses the key question: What constitutes a comprehensive set of best practices for addressing these issues and enhancing the scientific and societal impact of citizen science in monitoring plastic pollution from source to sea? Analyzing 84 studies, from beach cleanups to microplastic sampling, this review synthesizes best practices and identifies remaining gaps. It presents a structured framework designed to enhance data quality and volunteer participation. Key challenges include the ‘microplastic analytical bottleneck,’ the ‘digital divide,’ and notable geographical and demographic disparities that hinder the integration of policies. While citizen science is effective for large-scale data collection, its main challenge is translating data into actionable policies. The main contribution of this review is a series of practical recommendations aimed at improving methodological consistency, ensuring fair volunteer participation, and facilitating the transition from citizen data to evidence-based environmental management, thereby enhancing the effectiveness and impact of citizen science.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper