0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Citizen science sampling programs as a technique for monitoring microplastic pollution: results, lessons learned and recommendations for working with volunteers for monitoring plastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2019 68 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Shaun A. Forrest, Shaun A. Forrest, Jesse C. Vermaire Shaun A. Forrest, Shaun A. Forrest, Shaun A. Forrest, Shaun A. Forrest, Shaun A. Forrest, Shaun A. Forrest, Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Larissa Holman, Jesse C. Vermaire Larissa Holman, Jesse C. Vermaire Larissa Holman, Jesse C. Vermaire M. A. Murphy, M. A. Murphy, Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Larissa Holman, Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire M. A. Murphy, Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire M. A. Murphy, Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire Jesse C. Vermaire

Summary

Volunteers monitored microplastic contamination along 550 km of the Ottawa River in Canada using a standardized method, finding microplastics at almost every sampling site. Citizen science programs like this show promise for scaling up microplastic monitoring at low cost.

Study Type Environmental

A citizen science microplastic monitoring method was developed to engage the public and quantify microplastic contamination at various sites along an approximately 550 km length of the Ottawa River from Lake Temiskaming to Hawkesbury, Ontario, Canada. The volunteers filtered 100 L of river water through a 100-μm mesh at their desired location along the Ottawa River. All but one of the river samples (n = 43) contained microplastics, with the vast majority of microplastics identified as microfibers. Microplastic concentrations ranged from 0.02 to 0.41 microplastic pieces per litre. We noted numerous advantages in working with citizen scientists including actively engaging citizens in the research, ease of recruiting volunteers within the established Ottawa Riverkeeper network, and expanded spatial coverage at minimal additional costs. Despite these important advantages, there are some important considerations with citizen scientist sampling including the rare events where volunteers mislabelled sample sheets (e.g. labelling as control instead of river sample) and the relatively low volume of water (100 L) that the volunteers could easily sample using our methodology. Recommendations for future citizen science projects for freshwater microplastic research include utilising an established and engaged network, running both field and lab control samples (blanks) to obtain estimates of contamination with microplastic fibres, and increasing the amount of water filtered to obtain more reliable estimates of microplastic pollution in our freshwater ecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper