0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

The influence of exposure and physiology on microplastic ingestion by the freshwater fish Rutilus rutilus (roach) in the River Thames, UK

Environmental Pollution 2018 265 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Alice A. Horton, Martina G. Vijver Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Martina G. Vijver Alice A. Horton, Martina G. Vijver Monika D. Jürgens, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Martina G. Vijver Elma Lahive, Alice A. Horton, Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Alice A. Horton, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Monika D. Jürgens, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Alice A. Horton, Martina G. Vijver Alice A. Horton, Martina G. Vijver Elma Lahive, Monika D. Jürgens, Monika D. Jürgens, Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Monika D. Jürgens, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Monika D. Jürgens, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Peter M. van Bodegom, Peter M. van Bodegom, Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Alice A. Horton, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Elma Lahive, Monika D. Jürgens, Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Alice A. Horton, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Peter M. van Bodegom, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Peter M. van Bodegom, Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Peter M. van Bodegom, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Elma Lahive, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver Elma Lahive, Alice A. Horton, Martina G. Vijver Martina G. Vijver

Summary

Researchers examined microplastic ingestion by roach in the River Thames and found synthetic particles in fish from six of seven sampling sites, with ingestion rates linked to local microplastic exposure levels and fish feeding behavior. The study suggests that both environmental concentration and physiological factors like gut morphology and diet influence how much microplastic freshwater fish consume.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Microplastics are widespread throughout aquatic environments. However, there is currently insufficient understanding of the factors influencing ingestion of microplastics by organisms, especially higher predators such as fish. In this study we link ingestion of microplastics by the roach Rutilus rutilus, within the non-tidal part of the River Thames, to exposure and physiological factors. Microplastics were found within the gut contents of roach from six out of seven sampling sites. Of sampled fish, 33% contained at least one microplastic particle. The majority of particles were fibres (75%), with fragments and films also seen (22.7% and 2.3% respectively). Polymers identified were polyethylene, polypropylene and polyester, in addition to a synthetic dye. The maximum number of ingested microplastic particles for individual fish was strongly correlated to exposure (based on distance from the source of the river). Additionally, at a given exposure, the size of fish correlated with the actual quantity of microplastics in the gut. Larger (mainly female) fish were more likely to ingest the maximum possible number of particles than smaller (mainly male) fish. This study is the first to show microplastic ingestion within freshwater fish in the UK and provides valuable new evidence of the factors influencing ingestion that can be used to inform future studies on exposure and hazard of microplastics to fish.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper