0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastic Contamination of Wild and Captive Flathead Grey Mullet (Mugil cephalus)

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2018 153 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lewis T.O. Cheung, C Tsin-yee Lui, Lincoln Fok

Summary

Researchers compared microplastic ingestion in wild and captive flathead grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) in Hong Kong, finding contamination in 60% of wild fish versus only 16.7% of farmed fish, with wild individuals averaging 4.3 plastic items each. Polypropylene fibres under 2 mm were the dominant type, and microplastic abundance correlated positively with body size in wild fish.

Polymers

A total of 60 flathead grey mullets were examined for microplastic ingestion. Thirty wild mullets were captured from the eastern coast of Hong Kong and 30 captive mullets were obtained from fish farms. Microplastic ingestion was detected in 60% of the wild mullets, with an average of 4.3 plastic items per mullet, while only 16.7% of captive mullets were found to have ingested microplastics, with an average of 0.2 items per mullet. The results suggested that wild mullets have a higher risk of microplastic ingestion than their captive counterparts. The most common plastic items were fibres that were green in colour and small in size (<2 mm). Polypropylene was the most common polymer (42%), followed by polyethylene (25%). In addition, the abundance of microplastics was positively correlated with larger body size among the mullets.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics contamination of wild and farmed Goldspot mullets (Chelon parsia) in Khulna coastal region of Bangladesh

Researchers compared microplastic contamination in wild and farmed Goldspot mullet fish from Khulna, Bangladesh, finding MPs in all individuals with wild fish carrying more particles (average 11.9) than farmed fish (average 7.4), with fibers dominating in both groups.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Occurrence in Mugil Cephalus

Microplastics were found in 90% of 30 gray mullet (Mugil cephalus) specimens from a Turkish lake, with an average of 2.87 items per individual, dominated by PET (44.58%) and PP (34.94%) fibres and fragments ranging in size from 132 to 4850 microns.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic contamination in marine-cultured fish from the Pearl River Estuary, South China

Microplastic abundance was measured in the stomach and intestine of marine-cultured hybrid groupers from the Pearl River Estuary, finding that farmed fish accumulated plastics at levels comparable to wild-caught species. The study highlights aquaculture environments as sites of significant microplastic exposure even for fish not feeding on wild prey.

Article Tier 2

Evidence for non-selective ingestion of microplastic in demersal fish

Researchers found that 54% of demersal fish stomachs in Hong Kong contained microplastics across five species, with no significant difference between species, wild versus farmed fish, or locations, suggesting non-selective ingestion, though fish near the Pearl River showed higher contamination frequency.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence of Microplastics in the Gastrointestinal Tract and Gills of Fish from Guangdong, South China

Researchers analyzed microplastic contamination in the gastrointestinal tracts and gills of eight commercial fish species from coastal Guangdong, China. They found an average of 6.6 microplastic particles per fish, with fibers under 1 mm being the most common type, and noted that herbivorous and omnivorous fish accumulated more microplastics in their digestive systems than carnivorous species.

Share this paper