We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Testing laboratory protocols for micro- and nano-PET particles preparation by bottom-up chemical and top-down physical methods and implications for environmental studies
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested and compared chemical and physical methods for producing PET micro- and nanoparticles in the laboratory, evaluating each approach's ability to control particle size, shape, and purity. They found that each method has distinct trade-offs, with top-down grinding producing irregularly shaped particles more representative of environmental debris while bottom-up chemical methods offer better size control. The study provides practical guidance for standardizing how reference plastic particles are prepared for environmental research.
Micro- and nanoplastics are plastic particles with sizes below 1 or 5 mm for microplastics and 1 µm for nanoplastics. These particles can enter the environment through various pathways and subsequently affect all components of ecosystems. However, research on nanoplastics remains particularly limited, primarily due to challenges in isolating these particles from complex environmental matrices and producing them in controlled laboratory settings, especially in terms of size, shape, and purity. This study addresses the urgent need for standardized nanoplastic test materials by comparing various bottom-up and top-down laboratory methods for the preparation of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) micro- and nanoplastics, with a focus on their potential applications in environmental research. Chemical methods based on dissolution and recoagulation (using solvents such as 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol, trifluoroacetic acid, and chlorobenzene) and physical methods (including cryomilling and laser ablation) were evaluated. The resulting PET particles were characterized in terms of their size, polydispersity, morphology, and surface structure. For chemical methods, the presence of residual solvents was also analyzed. Chemical methods exhibited significant limitations, such as low reproducibility, polydisperse particles (PDI up to 11.4), strong aggregation tendencies, and the presence of potentially toxic solvent residues which make them unsuitable for standardized toxicity testing. From this point of view, physical methods represent solvent-free approaches. Cryomilling, however, proved ineffective due to surface melting of the particles during the process. Laser ablation produced highly monodisperse particles with regular spherical shapes, a median size of 340 nm, a size range of 193 to 9.5 µm, and a very low polydispersity index (PDI = 1.003 ± 0.002). These particles fall within the nanoplastic domain and showed no detectable contamination, making them especially suitable for environmental toxicity studies. Moreover, the method demonstrated consistent repeatability across replicates and is highly promising for producing standardized test materials for environmental fate, transport, and toxicity research.
More Papers Like This
Quality-by-design and current good practices for the production of test and reference materials for micro- and nano-plastic research
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers outlined best practices for producing standardized reference materials used in micro- and nanoplastic research, covering both top-down fragmentation and bottom-up precipitation methods. They provided examples using common polymers like polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, and PET across different size ranges. The study addresses a critical need in the field, since reliable reference materials are essential for validating the analytical methods used to detect and measure plastic pollution.
Production and Characterization of Polyethylene Terephthalate Nanoparticles
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a simple, scalable milling method for producing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) nanoparticles from commercial pellets for use in laboratory toxicology and environmental studies. The method avoids the need for liquid nitrogen and produces representative model nanoplastics at low cost with high yield. The study addresses a key barrier in nanoplastics research by providing accessible reference particles that more closely resemble environmental plastic debris.
Are we really producing environmentally relevant reference materials for microplastic studies?
AI summary Read the abstract
This study critically evaluated whether current laboratory-produced microplastic reference materials adequately represent the properties of microplastics found in real environments, examining particle morphology, chemical composition, and surface characteristics. Significant gaps were identified between commercially available reference materials and environmentally relevant particles, limiting the ecological realism of ecotoxicology studies.
Environmental Microplastic Particles vs. Engineered Plastic Microparticles—A Comparative Review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review compared environmental microplastic particles with engineered plastic microparticles used in laboratory studies, revealing significant discrepancies in size, shape, and polymer type that may limit the ecological relevance of current exposure research.
Facile preparation of environmentally relevant nano- and microplastics for hazard assessment and ecotoxicological testing evaluation
AI summary Read the abstract
PET nano- and microplastics were reproducibly generated from commercial polymer pellets using grinding processes that simulate environmental weathering, producing particles from 20 nm to 300 µm with surface hydroxylation and structural amorphization matching naturally aged plastics. These well-characterized, endotoxin-free test materials enable systematic in vitro hazard assessment that more faithfully reflects real-world environmental exposure.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.