0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Evaluation of calibration techniques in low-cost air quality sensing

Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja 2019 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Kasimir Aula

Summary

This study evaluated calibration techniques for improving the accuracy of low-cost air quality sensors, which are being deployed to expand pollution monitoring networks. As airborne microplastics become a recognized health concern, affordable and accurate monitoring tools will be important for tracking human exposure.

Air pollution is considered to be one of the biggest environmental risks to health, causing symptoms from headache to lung diseases, cardiovascular diseases and cancer. To improve awareness of pollutants, air quality needs to be measured more densely. Low-cost air quality sensors offer one solution to increase the number of air quality monitors. However, they suffer from low accuracy of measurements compared to professional-grade monitoring stations. \n \nThis thesis applies machine learning techniques to calibrate the values of a low-cost air quality sensor against a reference monitoring station. The calibrated values are then compared to a reference station’s values to compute error after calibration. In the past, the evaluation phase has been carried out very lightly. A novel method of selecting data is presented in this thesis to ensure diverse conditions in training and evaluation data, that would yield a more realistic impression about the capabilities of a calibration model. \n \nTo better understand the level of performance, selected calibration models were trained with data corresponding to different levels of air pollution and meteorological conditions. Regarding pollution level, using homogeneous training and evaluation data, the error of a calibration model was found to be even 85% lower than when using diverse training and evaluation pollution environment. Also, using diverse meteorological training data instead of more homogeneous data was shown to reduce the size of the error and provide stability on the behavior of calibration models.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Development of screening criteria for microplastic particles in air and atmospheric deposition: critical review and applicability towards assessing human exposure

Researchers evaluated 27 studies on microplastics in air and found that most scored below 50% on quality criteria — particularly for contamination controls and measuring particles smaller than 10 micrometers — highlighting the need for standardized methods before reliable human inhalation exposure assessments can be made.

Article Tier 2

Air pollution assessment using a cost-effective device: the case study of the northern Latium coastal area.

Researchers used a cost-effective sensor network to monitor air pollution in a coastal area of northern Lazio, Italy, finding elevated particulate matter concentrations linked to traffic and industrial sources. While focused on air quality rather than microplastics, airborne particulate monitoring is increasingly important for tracking atmospheric microplastic exposure in urban and coastal areas.

Article Tier 2

Assessment of quality control measures in the monitoring of microplastic: a critical review

Researchers conducted a critical review of quality control measures used in microplastic monitoring studies, evaluating eight key quality control parameters across 30 published studies. The review found that strict quality control protocols are essential for accurate microplastic detection, as small-sized particles and microfibers can easily be introduced as contaminants from ambient air, sampling equipment, and laboratory environments during the monitoring process.

Article Tier 2

Sampling strategies and analytical techniques for assessment of airborne micro and nano plastics

This review evaluates sampling strategies and analytical techniques for assessing airborne micro- and nanoplastics in indoor and outdoor environments, highlighting methodological limitations and the lack of standardization that hinder cross-study comparisons.

Review Tier 2

A Review of the Sampling, Analysis, and Identification Techniques of Microplastics in the Air: Insights into PM2.5 and PM10

This review systematically compared methods for sampling, analyzing, and identifying microplastics in air, with special focus on the PM2.5 and PM10 fine particle fractions that are most relevant to human respiratory health. The paper identifies key gaps and recommends standardized protocols to improve comparability of airborne microplastic research.

Share this paper