We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Development of screening criteria for microplastic particles in air and atmospheric deposition: critical review and applicability towards assessing human exposure
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers evaluated 27 studies on microplastics in air and found that most scored below 50% on quality criteria — particularly for contamination controls and measuring particles smaller than 10 micrometers — highlighting the need for standardized methods before reliable human inhalation exposure assessments can be made.
Abstract Over the last several years there has been an increase in studies reporting the presence of microplastic particles (MPs) in both indoor and outdoor air. Data reported reflect a variety of different types of air samples, which have helped to demonstrate the ubiquity of MPs in the atmosphere and their potential contribution to atmospheric particulate matter (PM). The relative quality of the data reporting on MPs in air has not been evaluated, but represents an important step towards improving our overall understanding of the human health implications in relation to inhalation exposure to MPs. Adopting recent approaches that have been proposed to assess the quality of data for those studies reporting concentrations in biota and water samples, we identify a suite of criteria used to screen studies reporting MPs in air for the purposes of evaluating their usefulness in assessing human exposure. Here we review and summarize data from 27 studies reporting MPs in various types of air samples and evaluate each of the studies against 11 separate criteria representing four main categories (sampling; contamination mitigation; sample purification / handling; characterization and application towards assessing human exposure). On average, studies scored 48.6% (range 18.2–81.8%) of the maximum score. Only one study received a positive score for all criteria, implying that there remains a need for future studies to consider strengthening implementation and reporting of QA/QC protocol. The most urgent areas requiring attention relate to the need for studies to avoid and verify background contamination and to strengthen the quantification of method recovery efficiencies. The majority of studies report data for particulates > 10 μm. Due to the associations between exposure to particles < 10 μm and human health effects, we recommend that prioritization efforts that develop standard protocols, based on existing air sampling methods capable of characterizing MPs < 10 μm are progressed.
More Papers Like This
A Review of the Sampling, Analysis, and Identification Techniques of Microplastics in the Air: Insights into PM2.5 and PM10
AI summary Read the abstract
This review systematically compared methods for sampling, analyzing, and identifying microplastics in air, with special focus on the PM2.5 and PM10 fine particle fractions that are most relevant to human respiratory health. The paper identifies key gaps and recommends standardized protocols to improve comparability of airborne microplastic research.
A review of atmospheric microplastics pollution: In-depth sighting of sources, analytical methods, physiognomies, transport and risks
AI summary Read the abstract
This review provides an in-depth analysis of atmospheric microplastic pollution, examining sources, detection methods, physical characteristics, transport mechanisms, and health risks. Researchers found that indoor environments tend to contain higher concentrations of airborne microplastics than outdoor settings, and that current detection methods are limited in their ability to capture the smallest particles. The study emphasizes the need for standardized sampling procedures and more research into the health effects of inhaling microplastic particles.
Analytical methods, source, concentration, and human risks of microplastics: a review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review provides a comprehensive assessment of atmospheric microplastic pollution, covering analytical detection methods, pollution sources, concentration levels, and potential human health risks from inhalation exposure. Researchers found significant variation in reported atmospheric microplastic levels due to differences in sampling and analysis methods across studies. The study calls for standardized protocols to enable meaningful comparisons and more accurate assessment of the health risks posed by airborne microplastics.
Assessment of quality control measures in the monitoring of microplastic: a critical review
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a critical review of quality control measures used in microplastic monitoring studies, evaluating eight key quality control parameters across 30 published studies. The review found that strict quality control protocols are essential for accurate microplastic detection, as small-sized particles and microfibers can easily be introduced as contaminants from ambient air, sampling equipment, and laboratory environments during the monitoring process.
Development of a standardized methodology for the identification and characterization of airborne microplastics in working spaces
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a standardized methodology for identifying and characterizing microplastics in both outdoor and indoor atmospheric samples, addressing the absence of harmonized protocols that limits comparability across airborne microplastic studies. The standardized approach improved reproducibility and allowed more accurate assessment of human inhalation exposure in different environments.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.