0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Remediation Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Environmental Impact Assessment of Bioplastic

2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Abdulhakeem Idris Abdulhakeem, Innocent Ojeba Musa, Peter Olabisi Abioye, Helen Shnada Auta, Mustapha Abdulsalam, Job Oloruntoba Samuel, Miracle Uwa Livinus, Muhammed Abdulazeez, Muhammed Abdulazeez, Asmau M. Maude, Fatima Adamu Yahaya, Shehu-Alimi Elelu, M. Adamu, Auwal Sagir Muhammad

Summary

This review assesses the environmental impacts of bioplastics as alternatives to conventional fossil-fuel-based plastics, evaluating their full lifecycle from production through degradation. It finds that while bioplastics offer reduced greenhouse gas emissions and compostability in some cases, their environmental performance varies greatly by polymer type and end-of-life scenario.

Polymers
Body Systems

Due to the increasing demand for plastic substitutes that are environmentally friendly, bioplastics have attracted interest since they are able to reduce the negative effects that fossil fuel plastics have on ecosystems. Bioplastics, which are made from renewable sources, have a lot of benefits, such as lower emissions than greenhouse gas (GHG), being degradable, and being recyclables as well as recoverable for energy. Compared to other common plastics, some bioplastics, including the polylactic acid and polyhydroxyalkanoates, can only take a few years to disintegrate under favourable conditions and hence do not contribute to the marine and land dump of plastics. Furthermore, bioplastics have a role in soil carbon dynamics, thus increasing soil fertility and increasing carbon sequestration potential. However, issues are still present, such as the slow biodegradation rate in the natural ecosystem and also the problem of mechanical recycling because of the presence of contamination by other petroleum-based plastics. Other alternative techniques like combustion reactions and anaerobic digestion provide promising pathways for better resource retrieval but come with additional energy requirements; however, they have limitations. Bioplastics have been promoted as an alternative solution to many environmental problems that plastics cause; however, there is still lacking information about the long-term ecological problems that these bioplastics will cause due to the small microplastic components that are bioplastic. Additional research is necessary to fully understand the fate and influence of bioplastics and microplastics in the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

A Review of Bioplastics and Their Adoption in the Circular Economy

This review examines the current landscape of bioplastics, including bio-based and biodegradable materials, as potential alternatives to conventional fossil-fuel-derived plastics. Researchers assessed standards, life cycle analyses, and environmental performance of various bioplastic types. The study highlights that while bioplastics offer potential benefits for reducing fossil resource dependency, challenges remain around their actual environmental performance and integration into circular economy systems.

Article Tier 2

Exploration of Bioplastics: A Review

This review assessed bioplastics as alternatives to petroleum-based plastics, covering their production, properties, biodegradability, and limitations as a solution to plastic pollution. While bioplastics offer reduced fossil fuel dependence, the authors noted that many only degrade under industrial composting conditions and are not a complete solution to environmental plastic accumulation.

Article Tier 2

A review of bioplastics as an alternative to petrochemical plastics: Its types, structure, characteristics, degradation, standards, and feedstocks

This review compares bioplastics to traditional petroleum-based plastics, covering their types, structure, biodegradability, and the standards they must meet to be called compostable. While bioplastics generally have a lower environmental footprint, not all of them fully break down in natural conditions, meaning some can still generate microplastic fragments. The review is relevant because understanding which alternative plastics truly degrade could help reduce the ongoing accumulation of microplastics in the environment.

Article Tier 2

A Sustainable Approach to Plastics; Bioplastics

This review examines bioplastics as a sustainable alternative to conventional plastics, comparing bio-based and biodegradable options against traditional plastics on environmental impact, biodegradability standards, and performance, finding that while bioplastics offer potential solutions to microplastic generation and soil toxicity, standardization and lifecycle assessment remain key challenges.

Article Tier 2

Benefits and Drawbacks of Bioplastic as an Alternative of Conventional Plastic towards Sustainable Plastic T

This review examines bioplastics derived from renewable biomass sources (such as corn starch, vegetable oils, and food waste) as sustainable alternatives to conventional petroleum-based plastics, evaluating their benefits and drawbacks across environmental performance, biodegradability, and scalability. The article explores whether bioplastics represent a viable pathway toward more sustainable plastic use given growing concerns over the non-biodegradable nature and resource intensity of conventional plastics.

Share this paper