0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Contrary to Marine Environments, Common Microplastics in Freshwater Systems May Not Emit Dimethyl Sulfide: An Important Infochemical

Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2019 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Lauren Zink, Greg G. Pyle

Summary

This study found that, unlike in marine environments where microplastics emit dimethyl sulfide signals that attract foragers, common microplastics in freshwater systems do not appear to produce such chemical cues. This suggests that microplastic ingestion in freshwater species may occur through different mechanisms than the olfactory pathways implicated in marine environments.

Study Type Environmental

The ingestion of microplastics by marine species has been at least partially attributed to plastics emitting a dimethyl sulfide signature when exposed to marine conditions. Dimethyl sulfide, a member of the volatile organic sulfur compounds group, is an infochemical that many species rely on to locate and identify prey while foraging. Microplastic ingestion is also observed in freshwater systems; however, this study shows that the same dimethyl sulfide signature is not obtained by three common types of plastic (high-density polyethylene, low-density polyethylene, and polystyrene) in freshwater systems, suggesting that there may be an alternate mechanism driving plastic ingestion by freshwater species.

Share this paper