0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Microplastics in the indoor environment

UBibliorum repositorio digital da ubi (University of Beira Interior) 2020 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
João Vasco Almeida Silva Valente

Summary

This review examines microplastic contamination in indoor environments, noting that people are continuously exposed to microplastics in household dust, air, and from flooring, furniture, and textiles. Indoor microplastic exposure is a key route of human inhalation and ingestion that has received less attention than environmental contamination.

Microplastics are plastic particles with sizes between 100 nm and 5 mm, being consideredan emerging class of contaminants with deleterious effects on the environment and human health.Polyethylene (PE), Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) and polyamide (PA-commonlyknown as nylon) are three of the most common polymers used in buildings and construction, packaging,personal careproducts and clothing. Due to MPs ubiquity in the environment, especiallyindoor, humans are continuously exposed. However, only a few studies regarding the contamination of the indoor environment by microplastics and their effects on health were performed to date. This work intends to develop an integrated strategy to study the microplastics present in the indoor environment and their potentialdeleterious effects.For this, the levels of MPs in airborn and house dust samples were estimated and the cytotoxicity of three different MPs (polyethylene, PVC and polyamide) was evaluated in three cell lines, namely intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2), hepatocytes (HepG2) and dopaminergic neurons (N27).In addition, and givingthe limitations of currently existing quantification techniques, a new strategy for isolating and purifying MPs from complex samples was developed using two-phase aqueous systems made up of ionic liquids. The results obtained from the analysis of MPs in air and dust samples using sodium chloride (NaCl) density separation and digestion with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and subsequent microscopic visualization after Nile Red staining showed that the largest amount of MPs corresponds to samples collected in kitchens. The new procedure developed for sample preparation using ILs generally allowed to extract the MPs from the dust matrix.However, the separation in a single step of the different MPs was not achieved and requires further optimization. Nevertheless, Raman spectroscopy proved to be efficient to identify MPs in house dust samples. The cytotoxicity tests showed that the dopaminergic neuron cell line was the most sensitive to microplastics’ exposure, with polyamide being the least toxic microplastic tested and PE the most toxic. For the tested concentrations (0.01; 0.1; 1; 10; 100; 1000; 2000; 4000 mg.L-1) the toxicity of the three MPs for intestinal epithelial cells and for hepatocytes was reduced, which shows the low toxicity of these MPs when tested in its pure and isolated, that is its native form without the addition of plasticizers, colourants, flame retardants or stabilizers.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Systematic Review Tier 1

Systematic Review on Indoor Microplastics: Unveiling Sources, Exposure Pathways, and Human Health Implications

This systematic review reveals that indoor environments are a significant and often overlooked source of microplastic exposure. People spend most of their time indoors, where microplastics shed from textiles, furniture, and packaging accumulate in dust and air, meaning your home and office may be major contributors to the microplastics you breathe and ingest daily.

Article Tier 2

Review of microplastics in the indoor environment: Distribution, human exposure and potential health impacts

This review comprehensively analyzes microplastic contamination in indoor environments, where most people spend the majority of their time. Researchers found that indoor exposure to microplastics comes from multiple sources including dust, air, drinking water, and food, with finer particles posing the greatest concern because they can enter the bloodstream and organs. The findings suggest that indoor microplastic exposure represents a meaningful but understudied health risk that requires further research into mitigation strategies.

Article Tier 2

Indoor Microplastics and Microfibers

This review examines microplastic and microfiber contamination in indoor environments like homes, schools, and workplaces, finding that indoor air and dust often contain more microplastics than outdoor air. Indoor sources like furniture, textiles, and synthetic materials constantly shed tiny plastic fibers that people inhale, ingest, and absorb through skin contact. The review highlights that indoor microplastic exposure, especially through breathing, may be a more significant route of human exposure than previously thought.

Article Tier 2

Exploring microplastics sources in indoor environments, an emerging pollutant

This study explores microplastics as an emerging indoor air and surface pollutant, examining the diverse sources that contribute to microplastic presence within indoor environments and characterizing the pathways by which people may be exposed.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence, human exposure, and risk of microplastics in the indoor environment

This review examines the often-overlooked issue of microplastic contamination in indoor environments, where people spend up to 90 percent of their time. Researchers found that indoor microplastic concentrations can be substantial, originating from synthetic textiles, furniture, and building materials. The study highlights a significant gap in understanding human microplastic exposure and calls for more research on the health risks of breathing in and ingesting these particles at home and work.

Share this paper