0
Article Tier 2 Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Synthetic Microfiber and Microbead Exposure and Retention Time in Model Aquatic Species Under Different Exposure Scenarios

Frontiers in Environmental Science 2020 49 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Brine shrimp readily ingested microbeads but not microfibers when exposed to both simultaneously, and the presence of food dramatically reduced microplastic ingestion in both shrimp and fish. The study highlights that realistic co-exposure conditions with food present may substantially change how organisms interact with microplastics.

Polymers
Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

Synthetic microfibers have been reported in most aquatic environments and represent a large proportion of environmental microplastics. However, they remain largely under-represented in microplastic ecotoxicity studies. The present study aims to investigate particle interaction with, and retention time in, aquatic organisms comparing microfibers and microbeads. We used brine shrimp (Artemia sp.) and fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus) as invertebrate and vertebrate models, respectively. Organisms were exposed to a mixture of microbeads (polyethylene, 27 – 32 µm) and microfibers (dope dyed polyester; 500 µm-long) for 2h, at high concentrations (100 000 part./L) in order to maximize organism-particles interaction. Artemia were exposed in presence or absence of food. Fish were exposed either via the trophic route or directly via water, and water exposures were performed either in freshwater or seawater. In absence of food, Artemia ingested high numbers of microbeads, retained in their digestive tract for up to 96h. Microfiber ingestion was very limited and their egestion fast. In presence of food, no microfiber was ingested, microbead ingestion was limited and egestion was fast (48h). Limited particle ingestion was observed in fish exposed via water, and particle retention time in gut did not exceed 48h, both for direct and trophic exposure. However, water exposures resulted in higher number of particles present in gills, and average retention time was higher in gills, compared to gut. This suggests that gills are organs susceptible to microplastic exposure, and should be taken into account in fish exposure and effect studies. Our results show that particle ingestion and retention by organisms differ between microbeads and microfibers, suggesting particle selection based on size, shape and/or color, and species-specific selective feeding. We also showed that the presence of food results in limited particle ingestion and retention in Artemia, and that microbeads are more likely to be transferred to organisms from upper trophic levels than microfibers. Finally, fish exposure to particles was not significantly different between freshwater and seawater conditions.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Ingestion of microplastic fibers by the shrimp Palaemon varians

AI summary Read the abstract

This thesis examined microplastic ingestion, retention, and egestion in the common ditch shrimp Palaemon varians using polyacrylic fibers and polystyrene beads as test particles. The results document how shrimp ingest microplastics from their food and how particle type and food concentration affect retention, providing insights into plastic uptake in crustaceans.

Article Tier 2

Screening study of four environmentally relevant microplastic pollutants: Uptake and effects on Daphnia magna and Artemia franciscana

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed Daphnia water fleas and brine shrimp to four real-world microplastic types from consumer products, finding that smaller particles were ingested more readily by daphnids, that gut accumulation depended on particle size, and that while no acute lethality occurred, brine shrimp growth was impaired.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

A meta-analysis of the effects of exposure to microplastics on fish and aquatic invertebrates

AI summary Read the abstract

Microplastic effects on fish and aquatic invertebrates were highly variable across taxa, but the most consistent finding was reduced consumption of natural prey when microplastics were present; zooplankton and other prey organisms appeared particularly susceptible, with potential food web ramifications.

Article Tier 2

Ingestion and adherence of microplastics by estuarine mysid shrimp

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated how estuarine mysid shrimp ingest and accumulate microplastics both internally and on their external body surfaces. The study found microplastics in the shrimp's bodies and fecal pellets, and feeding experiments revealed that these organisms readily consume plastic particles, raising concerns about microplastic transfer through marine food webs.

Article Tier 2

Mediated food and hydrodynamics on the ingestion of microplastics by Daphnia magna

AI summary Read the abstract

This study investigated how food availability and water flow affect microplastic ingestion by Daphnia magna, finding that hydrodynamic conditions and food presence significantly influenced the rate at which these zooplankton took up microplastic particles.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper