Article
?
AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button.
Tier 2
?
Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence.
Environmental Sources
Sign in to save
Microplastic shape, concentration and polymer type affect soil properties and plant biomass
2020
22 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 30
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Anika Lehmann,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Anika Lehmann,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Anika Lehmann,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Timon Lehnert,
Timon Lehnert,
Timon Lehnert,
Timon Lehnert,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Lydia T. Linck,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Lydia T. Linck,
Lydia T. Linck,
Lydia T. Linck,
Matthias C. Rillig
Anika Lehmann,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Anika Lehmann,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Anika Lehmann,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Matthias C. Rillig
Anika Lehmann,
Anika Lehmann,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Anika Lehmann,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Anika Lehmann,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Yudi M. Lozano,
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig
Summary
Experiments showed that microplastic shape, concentration, and polymer type all influence soil physical properties and plant biomass, with certain types reducing plant growth. The findings highlight that the wide variety of plastic particle types entering soils creates complex and variable ecological risks.
ABSTRACT Microplastics are an increasing concern in terrestrial systems. These particles can be incorporated into the soil in a wide range of shapes and polymers, reflecting the fact that manufacturers produce plastics in a variety of physical and chemical properties matching their intended use.Despite of this, little is known about the effects that the addition into the soil of microplastics of different shapes, polymer type and concentration levels may have on soil properties and plant performance. To fill this gap, we selected four microplastic shapes: fibers, films, foams and fragments; and for each shape we selected three microplastics made of one of the following polymers: polyester, polyamide, polypropylene, polyethylene, polyethylenterephthalat, polyurethane, polystyrene and polycarbonate. In a glasshouse experiment, each microplastic was added to a soil from a dry grassland at a concentration of 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3% and 0,4%. A carrot ( Daucus carota ) plant grew in each pot during four weeks. At harvest, shoot and root mass, soil aggregation and microbial activity were measured. Our results showed that all microplastic shapes increased shoot and root masses. As concentration increased, microfibers increased plant biomass probably as fibers may hold water in the soil for longer. In contrast, microfilms decreased biomass with concentration, likely because they can create channels in the soil that promote water evaporation affecting plant performance. All microplastic shapes decreased soil aggregation, probably since microplastics may introduce fracture points in the aggregates affecting their stability and also due to potential negative effects on soil biota. The latter may also explain the decrease in microbial activity with, for example, polyethylene films. Similar to plant biomass, microfilms decreased soil aggregation with increasing concentration. Our study tested the microplastic shape mediation and dissimilarity hypotheses, highlighting the importance of microplastic shape, polymer type and concentration when studying the effects of microplastics on terrestrial systems.