0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Comparison of adsorption and desorption of triclosan between microplastics and soil particles

Chemosphere 2020 116 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xian Chen, Xuanning Gu, Xuanning Gu, Lijing Bao, Lijing Bao, Lijing Bao, Lijing Bao, Lijing Bao, Xuanning Gu, Xuanning Gu, Shanshan Ma, Lijing Bao, Yinghui Mu Xuanning Gu, Xuanning Gu, Yinghui Mu

Summary

Researchers compared adsorption and desorption of triclosan on polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics versus soil particles, finding that PE had the highest adsorption rate and equilibrium capacity while PS and soil showed similar profiles. The results suggest that microplastics in soil environments can compete with soil particles for triclosan binding, potentially altering the contaminant's mobility and bioavailability.

Polymers

Microplastic (MP) pollution in soil has been becoming an emerging environmental hot spot, but little is known about the interaction between MPs and chemical contaminants in soil. In this study, batch experiments were performed to study adsorption-desorption behavior and mechanism of triclosan (TCS) on MPs, polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS), and soil particles. PE showed the highest adsorption rate (29.3 mg μg h) and equilibrium capacity (1248 μg g), while the similar profiles between PS (0.27 mg μg h and 1033 μg g, respectively) and soil (0.60 mg μg h and 961 μg g, respectively). Two adsorption stages, representing liquid-film and intra-particle diffusion were observed obviously for PE. Adsorption isotherm results revealed that the interaction between MPs and TCS was relatively weak. The sorption potential of soil was lower than that of MPs especially at high concentrations. PE addition induced TCS sorption increase in soil, while PS had no significant (P > 0.05) influence. For MP-soil systems, TCS preferred to adsorb on MPs, which was more pronounced for PE than PS. The desorption rate of TCS was the highest for soil, followed by PE and PS, while equilibrium release amount ranked: PE > PS > soil. Moreover, soil solution better facilitated the desorption, with the amount increasing by 38% for PE compared with 0.01 M CaCl solution. Therefore, MPs, especially PE with high adsorption and desorption potentials may serve as a source and carrier to TCS, and its amendment can change TCS environmental behavior and further risk in soil.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper