0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

No evidence of spherical microplastics (10–300 μm) translocation in adult rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after a two-week dietary exposure

PLoS ONE 2020 42 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Joel Kim, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Joel Kim, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman David G. Poirier, Malak Bayoumi, Malak Bayoumi, Joel Kim, David G. Poirier, Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Paul A. Helm, Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman David G. Poirier, Chelsea M. Rochman Malak Bayoumi, Malak Bayoumi, Paul A. Helm, Paul A. Helm, David G. Poirier, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, David G. Poirier, David G. Poirier, Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Malak Bayoumi, Malak Bayoumi, Paul A. Helm, Paul A. Helm, Chelsea M. Rochman Joel Kim, Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman Chelsea M. Rochman

Summary

Rainbow trout were exposed to spherical microplastics ranging from 10 to 300 micrometers to determine whether particles translocate from the gut into body tissues in adult fish. No evidence of microplastic translocation from the gastrointestinal tract to systemic tissues was found, suggesting that fish gut removal before consumption reduces but may not eliminate human dietary microplastic exposure.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

The consumption of fish contaminated with microplastics is often cited as a pathway for human exposure. However, because their guts are generally removed before consumption, exposure may be low compared to other routes such as shellfish, drinking water and dust. Still, microplastics have been found to translocate from the gut to other tissues, making exposure from eating fish fillets or other seafood products a potential concern. To better understand fish as an exposure route for microplastics in humans, we tested hypotheses about whether translocation occurs and if efficiency of translocation is dependent on particle size. We investigated the amount and distribution of fluorescent polyethylene microspheres (10-300 μm) in the gut, liver, fillets and gonads of adult rainbow trout after a two-week dietary exposure. Fish were fed food pellets dosed with up to ~9,800 microspheres per gram of food. Total exposures over the entire experiment ranged from ~80,000-850,000 microspheres per fish. We did not find any particles in the fillets, liver, or gonads of any fish, suggesting that translocation of spherical microplastics of this size range does not occur in adult rainbow trout. The quantity of microplastics found in the gut was also low or absent after a 24-hour depuration period, indicating effective excretion in this laboratory population. This research suggests that the consumption of fish fillets may not be a significant exposure pathway for microspheres >10 μm in size to contaminate humans. Future studies should test for different sizes, morphologies and species to further our understanding.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper