0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Abatement of Microplastics from Municipal Effluents by Two Different Wastewater Treatment Technologies

WIT transactions on ecology and the environment 2020 11 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared two wastewater treatment technologies for microplastic removal: membrane bioreactors and rapid sand filtration after activated sludge treatment. Both achieved high removal efficiencies for most of the 14 identified polymer types, but some microplastics still pass through to receiving waters.

Study Type Environmental

This paper discusses the role of two different wastewater treatment technologies in the removal efficiency of microplastics from the final effluent of an urban wastewater treatment plant; i.e., a membrane bioreactor as an advanced wastewater treatment technology and rapid sand filtration as a tertiary treatment after an activated sludge process. Fourteen different polymer types were identified in all wastewater samples, mainly represented by low-density polyethylene (71.89%), high-density polyethylene (5.44%), acrylate (5.24%), polypropylene (5.22%), polystyrene (4.24%), and nylon (2.56%). The main forms isolated were fibres (61.2%), followed by films (31.5%), fragments (6.7%), and beads (0.6%). The main size interval corresponded to 1 and 2 mm, accounting for 28.2%, 37.3%, and 36.8% for the influent, membrane bioreactor, and rapid sand filtration, respectively. A total of 480 microplastic particles were isolated in all wastewater samples, with an average concentration of 2.16 0.42 items l -1 , and removal rate percentages of 79.01% for the membrane bioreactor and 75.49% for rapid sand filtration. Both technologies proved to be more efficient removing particulate microplastics (98.83% and 95.53%, respectively) than fibres (57.61% and 53.83%, respectively), showing a clear escape into the aquatic environment for fibres. The average microplastic size displayed a statistically significant increase from the influent of the sewage treatment plant (1.05 0.05 mm), to rapid sand filtration effluent (1.15 0.08 mm) and membrane bioreactor (1.39 0.15 mm) (F-test = 4.014, p = 0.019) indicating the fibre selection made by advanced treatment technologies previously discussed.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Membrane bioreactor and rapid sand filtration for the removal of microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant

AI summary Read the abstract

A wastewater treatment plant was monitored for 18 months to compare microplastic removal by membrane bioreactor technology versus rapid sand filtration, finding that membrane bioreactors achieved much higher removal efficiency but that both technologies still released microplastics into receiving waters.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Microplastic particles in the aquatic environment: A systematic review

AI summary Read the abstract

Among treatment technologies for microplastic removal from water, membrane bioreactors achieved the highest efficiency (>99%), followed by activated sludge (~98%) and rapid sand filtration (~97%), while hybrid treatment approaches showed the best overall removal performance.

Article Tier 2

How to remove microplastics in wastewater? A cost-effectiveness analysis

AI summary Read the abstract

A cost-effectiveness analysis of microplastic removal in wastewater treatment found that activated sludge, rapid sand filtering, and membrane bioreactor technologies differ substantially in removal efficiency and cost per unit removed, with membrane bioreactors achieving the highest removal but at prohibitive cost.

Article Tier 2

The Effect of Wastewater Treatment Methods on the Retainment of Plastic Microparticles

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examined how different wastewater treatment methods retain or remove plastic microparticles, finding that treatment plant design significantly affects how many microplastics escape to the environment. Advanced treatment processes such as membrane bioreactors outperformed conventional activated sludge systems in removing microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Influence of wastewater treatment process on pollution characteristics and fate of microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated microplastic abundance and removal efficiency across four wastewater treatment plants using different treatment technologies, finding influent concentrations between 539 and 1,290 particles per liter that were reduced substantially by primary and secondary treatment. Smaller microplastic particles proved hardest to remove and most likely to persist in final effluent.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper