0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Species Sensitivity to Toxic Substances: Evolution, Ecology and Applications

Frontiers in Environmental Science 2020 141 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
David J. Spurgeon, Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Alex Robinson, Stephen Short, Peter Kille

Summary

This review explores why different species vary in their sensitivity to toxic substances, examining the evolutionary and ecological factors that drive these differences. Researchers analyzed how traits like metabolic capacity, body size, and life history influence how organisms respond to chemical exposure. The study provides a framework for improving ecotoxicological predictions by better understanding the biological basis of species sensitivity.

Because it is only possible to test chemicals for effects on a restricted range of species and exposure scenarios, ecotoxicologists are faced with a significant challenge of how to translate the measurements in model species into predictions of impacts for the wider range of species in ecosystems. Because of this challenge, within ecotoxicology there is no more fundamental aspect than to understand the nature of the traits that determine sensitivity. To account for the uncertainties of species extrapolations in risk assessment, “safety factors” or species sensitivity distributions are commonly used. While valuable as pragmatic tools, these approaches have no mechanistic grounding. Here we highlight how mechanistic information that is increasingly available for a range of traits can be used to understand and potentially predict species sensitivity to chemicals. We review current knowledge on how toxicokinetic, toxicodynamic, physiological, and ecological traits contribute to differences in sensitivity. We go on to discuss how this information is being used to make predictions of sensitivity using correlative and trait-based approaches, including comparisons of target receptor orthologs. Finally, we discuss how the emerging knowledge and associated tools can be used to enhance theoretical and applied ecotoxicological research through improvements in mechanistic modeling, predictive ecotoxicology, species sensitivity distribution development, mixture toxicity assessment, chemical design, biotechnology application and mechanistically informed monitoring.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Intraspecific Sensitivity to Toxicants – a Methodological Problem of Bioassay: Review

This review examined the mechanisms underlying intraspecific differences in sensitivity to toxicants, finding that both genetic factors (mutations, polymorphism, gender) and non-genetic factors (age, physiological state, environmental conditions) contribute to variability in bioassay responses.

Article Tier 2

Insights into the mechanisms of within-species variation in sensitivity to chemicals: A case study using daphnids exposed to CMIT/MIT biocide

Researchers compared how two strains of the water flea Daphnia pulex responded to a common industrial biocide and found that differences in sensitivity between strains of the same species were as large as differences between separate species, with epigenetic modifications (chemical tags on DNA) playing a key role in determining toxicity outcomes.

Article Tier 2

Metabolomic Studies for the Evaluation of Toxicity Induced by Environmental Toxicants on Model Organisms

This review described how environmental metabolomics — measuring small-molecule profiles in model organisms — can be used to assess the toxicity of environmental contaminants including microplastics, heavy metals, and pesticides, and highlighted key organisms, methods, and data analysis approaches.

Article Tier 2

Nutritional physiology and ecology of wildlife in a changing world

This review examined how environmental change — including chemical pollution and habitat degradation — affects the nutritional physiology and ecology of wildlife, providing a broad framework for understanding pollutant impacts on animal health.

Article Tier 2

Ecological Risks of Microplastic Toxicity on Biota and Plants

This review examines the ecological risks of microplastic toxicity to a wide range of organisms including plants, invertebrates, fish, and soil biota, synthesizing dose-response data and identifying the most sensitive species and exposure pathways across terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Share this paper