0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Intraspecific Sensitivity to Toxicants – a Methodological Problem of Bioassay: Review

Journal of Ecological Engineering 2021 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
A. S. Olkova

Summary

This review examined the mechanisms underlying intraspecific differences in sensitivity to toxicants, finding that both genetic factors (mutations, polymorphism, gender) and non-genetic factors (age, physiological state, environmental conditions) contribute to variability in bioassay responses.

The article discusses the scientific studies that reveal the mechanisms of intraspecific differences in responses of organisms to chemical exposure. The factors of individual sensitivity to toxicants are represented by genetic differences between individuals of the same species and genetically unconditioned factors. The genetic factors are mutations, including under-researched mitochondrial DNA mutations and genomic drift, genetic polymorphism, and gender-related differences. Age, conditions of keeping and state of organisms, seasonal variations of body functions, and biotic interactions are considered as the factors that are not related to the genetic apparatus. The article considers a number of works, in which the effects of the combined action of external factors on sensitivity of organisms in model groups are studied.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Species Sensitivity to Toxic Substances: Evolution, Ecology and Applications

This review explores why different species vary in their sensitivity to toxic substances, examining the evolutionary and ecological factors that drive these differences. Researchers analyzed how traits like metabolic capacity, body size, and life history influence how organisms respond to chemical exposure. The study provides a framework for improving ecotoxicological predictions by better understanding the biological basis of species sensitivity.

Article Tier 2

Insights into the mechanisms of within-species variation in sensitivity to chemicals: A case study using daphnids exposed to CMIT/MIT biocide

Researchers compared how two strains of the water flea Daphnia pulex responded to a common industrial biocide and found that differences in sensitivity between strains of the same species were as large as differences between separate species, with epigenetic modifications (chemical tags on DNA) playing a key role in determining toxicity outcomes.

Article Tier 2

Sickness behaviour and the effect of sex, age, and immune status on individual behavioural variation in Tenebrio molitor

This study examined how sex, age, and immune status mediate individual variation in sickness behaviour across animal populations, finding that these factors shape the magnitude and duration of behavioural responses to illness. The work has implications for understanding how environmental stressors including contaminants interact with immune function to affect wildlife behaviour.

Article Tier 2

Sex-specific effects of psychoactive pollution on behavioral individuality and plasticity in fish

Researchers exposed guppies to the antidepressant fluoxetine across multiple generations and found that the drug altered behavioral individuality and flexibility differently in males versus females. Males showed reduced variation in activity levels, while females maintained more behavioral diversity but changed their stress responses. The study suggests that pharmaceutical pollution in waterways may subtly reshape animal behavior in ways that differ between sexes, with potential consequences for population adaptability.

Article Tier 2

Bioassay complexities—exploring challenges in aquatic chemosensory research

This paper examines the challenges of studying how aquatic organisms detect and respond to chemical signals in their environment. Researchers found that many experimental assumptions, such as whether animals are ready to respond or have already been exposed to test cues, introduce significant variability into study results. The study suggests that the field needs better standardized methods to produce reliable and comparable findings across different laboratories.

Share this paper