0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Sign in to save

Nutritional physiology and ecology of wildlife in a changing world

Conservation Physiology 2017 160 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Kim Birnie‐Gauvin, Steven J. Cooke Steven J. Cooke Steven J. Cooke Steven J. Cooke Steven J. Cooke Kathryn S. Peiman, Steven J. Cooke Steven J. Cooke David Raubenheimer, Steven J. Cooke Steven J. Cooke Steven J. Cooke David Raubenheimer, Steven J. Cooke

Summary

This review examined how environmental change — including chemical pollution and habitat degradation — affects the nutritional physiology and ecology of wildlife, providing a broad framework for understanding pollutant impacts on animal health.

Body Systems

Over the last century, humans have modified landscapes, generated pollution and provided opportunities for exotic species to invade areas where they did not evolve. In addition, humans now interact with animals in a growing number of ways (e.g. ecotourism). As a result, the quality (i.e. nutrient composition) and quantity (i.e. food abundance) of dietary items consumed by wildlife have, in many cases, changed. We present representative examples of the extent to which vertebrate foraging behaviour, food availability (quantity and quality) and digestive physiology have been modified due to human-induced environmental changes and human activities. We find that these effects can be quite extensive, especially as a result of pollution and human-provisioned food sources (despite good intentions). We also discuss the role of nutrition in conservation practices, from the perspective of both <i>in situ</i> and <i>ex situ</i> conservation. Though we find that the changes in the nutritional ecology and physiology of wildlife due to human alterations are typically negative and largely involve impacts on foraging behaviour and food availability, the extent to which these will affect the fitness of organisms and result in evolutionary changes is not clearly understood, and requires further investigation.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper