0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

The Barrier Role of Macrophytes in Pollution of Water Bodies with Micriplastics

Nauka Innovatsii Tekhnologii 2021 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
V. D. Kazmiruk

Summary

Ukrainian researchers found that aquatic macrophytes (water plants) can act as physical barriers that trap microplastics and prevent their spread in water bodies. Wetland vegetation may offer a natural, low-cost way to reduce microplastic transport in rivers and lakes.

Polymers

Introduction. The widespread use of plastic products, both for industrial and household needs, the relative cheapness, ease of production and processing of plastics, the ability to change their physical and consumer properties, led to the fact that this material has become one of the most popular in the life of modern society. At the same time, the massive use of synthetic polymer materials has given rise to the emergence of a new environmental pollutant - plastic microparticles (microplastics). It has been experimentally established that, aquatic plants make it possible to localize waters pollution by microplastics and contribute to its deposition and burial. Materials and methods of research. Field and laboratory studies was conducted to envestigate the retention rate of high-density polyethylene microparticles by Phragmites communis Trin., Typha angustifolia L., Glyceria maxima, Acorus calamus L., Iris pseudacorus, Carex acuta, Ceratophyllum demersum L. Potamogeton perfoliatus L., Potamogeton lucens L., Potamogeton natans, P. hetero-phyllus x P. Perfoliatus, Nymphaea candida, Nuphar lutea (L.) Smith, and Trapa natans. It has been experimentally established that, the retention rate of plastic microparticles by macrophytes depends on the material of their origin, particle hardness, size, concentration, as well as density, morphological and ecological characteristics of plants. For various species of macrophytes, the retention rate of microparticles in the size range of 1-5 mm ranges from 22 to 100 %>. The obtained results showed a good agreement with the materials of recent studies on the interaction between plastic microparticles with macrophytes of marine regions. Results and Discussion. Conclusion. The regulation of surface water pollution by microparticles of synthetic polymeric materials, along with other measures, can include targeted cultivation of aquatic plants, their introduction and biomass growth at the right time, in the right places and in the required quantities. Such zones can function autonomously without human intervention and capital investments. For the placement and creation of buffer zones with macrophytes, it is possible to use lands that are not suitable for other uses - former landfills, wastelands, small dry valleys, wetlands.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Мacrophyte thickets as traps for microplastics: retention rates and mechanisms

Researchers examined the mechanisms and retention rates by which macrophyte thickets trap microplastic particles in freshwater bodies, analyzing how particle properties — including hardness, size, density, and concentration — and plant morphological characteristics influence retention. They found that retention rates ranged from 22 to 100% across macrophyte species for particles of 1-5 mm, with trapping driven by flow resistance, wave energy attenuation, mechanical interception by plant structures, and adhesion enhanced by sticky periphyton biofilms.

Article Tier 2

Leaf morphology affects microplastic entrapment efficiency in freshwater macrophytes

Researchers found that leaf morphology significantly affects the ability of freshwater macrophytes (aquatic plants) to trap microplastics, with leaf shape and surface texture influencing particle capture efficiency. The findings suggest that aquatic vegetation plays an underappreciated role in microplastic retention and transport in freshwater ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

A low-impact nature-based solution for reducing aquatic microplastics from freshwater ecosystems

Researchers developed a nature-based solution using the submerged plant Myriophyllum aquaticum to capture and retain microplastics from freshwater ecosystems. Through optimization experiments, they achieved high retention efficiency with minimal environmental disruption. The study demonstrates that aquatic plants can serve as a low-impact, practical tool for reducing microplastic pollution in rivers and lakes.

Article Tier 2

Transport dynamics of microplastics within aquatic vegetation featuring realistic plant morphology

Researchers investigated how aquatic vegetation with realistic plant structures affects the transport and trapping of microplastics in river environments. They found that floating plant canopies significantly altered water flow and increased microplastic retention, with smaller nanoscale particles being trapped more effectively than larger ones. The study suggests that aquatic vegetation may act as a natural filter, accumulating microplastics and potentially preventing their transport downstream to oceans.

Article Tier 2

Marine macrophytes retain microplastics

Water sampled within thickets of Baltic Sea macrophytes contained on average 1.7 times more microplastic particles than water sampled outside, with fibers dominating, suggesting that aquatic vegetation physically traps floating microplastics and functions as an important retention zone that concentrates pollution within coastal habitats.

Share this paper