0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Leaf morphology affects microplastic entrapment efficiency in freshwater macrophytes

Marine and Freshwater Research 2023 13 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Peter A. Todd Peter A. Todd Joel W. Q. Tan, Clara Lei Xin Yong, Clara Lei Xin Yong, Peter A. Todd Ray J. Tong, Clara Lei Xin Yong, Clara Lei Xin Yong, Peter A. Todd Zhe Tang, Peter A. Todd Peter A. Todd Colin Z. D. Lee, Clara Lei Xin Yong, Peter A. Todd Peter A. Todd Clara Lei Xin Yong, Clara Lei Xin Yong, Peter A. Todd Peter A. Todd Peter A. Todd Peter A. Todd Peter A. Todd

Summary

Researchers found that leaf morphology significantly affects the ability of freshwater macrophytes (aquatic plants) to trap microplastics, with leaf shape and surface texture influencing particle capture efficiency. The findings suggest that aquatic vegetation plays an underappreciated role in microplastic retention and transport in freshwater ecosystems.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Context In contrast to marine environments, microplastic pollution in freshwater systems is understudied. Previous research suggests that freshwater macrophytes function as microplastic sinks, which, because they are at the base of food webs, has implications for higher trophic levels. Aim This study compares the ability of freshwater plants with different leaf morphologies to trap downwelling microplastics. Method Microplastics (800–1000 µm polyamide grains) were deposited onto three macrophyte species, namely, Cabomba caroliniana, Egeria densa, and Hygrophila polysperma. Microplastic mass retained was calculated as the percentage of microplastic mass captured by the plant and standardised microplastic retention was calculated as the absolute microplastic mass retained (g) divided by plant dry mass (g). Results The amount of trapped microplastics differed significantly among species, with the highest amount trapped by C. caroliniana (39.3%; 7.91 g g-1), followed by E. densa (28.8%; 5.30 g g-1) and H. polysperma (17.6%; 4.47 g g-1). Conclusion Significant differences in microplastic retention among species may be attributed to variation in leaf morphology. Implications These findings have potential applications in bioremediation and biomonitoring, where freshwater macrophytes could help with the tracking and mitigation of microplastics in the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper