0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Efficacy of Microplastic Separation Techniques on Seawater Samples: Testing Accuracy Using High-Density Polyethylene

Biological Bulletin 2021 23 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Patricia Menéndez, Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Michaela E. Miller, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti Cherie A. Motti Frederieke J. Kroon, Cherie A. Motti

Summary

Scientists tested four common methods for separating microplastics from seawater samples and found that each method recovered different amounts and types of particles. Standardizing separation methods is critical for making microplastic concentration data comparable across different studies.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

AbstractMicroplastic contamination of the marine environment has been reported globally. Its pervasiveness has highlighted the importance of accurate quantification to enable comparability within and between different environmental matrices. The potential efficacy of different methods to separate microplastics from their environmental sample matrix, however, is rarely validated. In this study, we examine the effects of four commonly used separation methods for seawater samples, namely, visual separation, density flotation, acidic digestion, and enzymatic digestion, using high-density polyethylene as our model microplastic. For each separation method, clarification efficiencies of the sample matrix, spiked recovery of high-density polyethylene microparticles, and potential changes in the chemical and physical characteristics of high-density polyethylene were assessed. High, albeit variable, recovery rates (>83%) of high-density polyethylene microparticles were achieved across all methods. Concentrated nitric acid was most effective at eliminating biological material from seawater samples. No apparent physical (<i>i.e.</i>, length or color) or chemical changes due to separation treatments were observed in recovered high-density polyethylene microparticles, with the one exception that enzymatic digestion obscured polymer identification of high-density polyethylene. Our findings highlight the need to determine and report on the accuracy of separation methods for different polymer types and specific environmental sample matrices to ensure accurate quantification of marine microplastic contamination.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper